Main »

Reviews

Tasks

edit SideBar

Paper Reviews and Class Participation

Students are expected to have completed the assigned readings before attending class and actively participate in discussions.

To facilitate great class discussions, students must submit an email review of selected papers 11:00am before the lecture for which the paper is assigned. Late reviews will not be accepted and the time is based on when the email is received, not sent.

I encourage students are encouraged to form study groups to discuss the papers before writing their reviews, but each student must write their own independent review.

Reviews should be emailed to Prof. David Wood (david@cs...) with:

    Subject: [CS752 Review] Author1 Year
    (e.g., [CS752 Review] Dagum 1998)

    The ASCII body of the message (NOT an attachment; NOT HTML; NOT PDF) should be 20 to 40 lines (maximum 3200 characters) with:
  • a short summary of the problem the paper attacks and methods used (if any),
  • a short summary of the paper's results or key implications,
  • your opinion about what's good and bad about the paper, and
  • a topic/question for lecture

Follow instructions exactly so that email filters do not lose your review. The last two points are key and best enable your review to stand out.

Reviews will be graded on a scale of Excellent (10 points), Satisfactory (7 points), and Unsatisfactory (3 points). Most reviews will get a 7. Reviews that are too long will automatically receive an Unsatisfactory grade. Reviews that fail to exactly follow the subject line rules will not be graded! Reviews will be graded by sampling rather than grading each review turned in. The purpose here is to get students to read (and discuss) papers before they are discussed in class.

See Course Calendar for review schedule.


Page last modified on January 21, 2014, at 02:52 PM, visited times