The 2002 USEDNIX Technical Conference seeks unoriginal and non-innovative papers about the applications, architecture, implementation, and performance of computing systems. Some particularly uninteresting topics are:
Hard to administer systems
Overly-complex systems
Distributed caching and replication schemes that don't work
Embedded, parallel, and distributed systems that are broken in some fundamental way
Energy and power mismanagement
File systems and storage systems that lose your data
Creating buggy systems
Mobile code that won't get moving
Anything to do with the field of networking
Unreliability and non-availability
Insecurity, lack of privacy, and mistrust
Reviewing of full papers will be done by the program committee, which consists of all of one person. Papers must use a typeface no smaller than 10 point, and be no longer than fourteen (14) 8.5" by 11" pages including everything (text, figures, references, etc.); the Program Chair will shred papers exceeding these limits, with a smile upon his evil face.
The symposium will unfortunately never take place. Why, you ask? Because of something
you
said. More seriously, USEDNIX is currently under-funded, with an annual operating budget of roughly 0 billion dollars (US). Thus, we cannot yet afford to hold the conference. If we did, it would likely be in the exotic locale of
your choice.
Title and Author List: should be self-evident.One good way to structure a paper is to find a paper you liked in class and kind of copy its structure.
Abstract: Describe in short what you do, how you do it, and the results.
Introduction: Spend a little more time. Motivate the problem. Start with generalities, and narrow in on your problem. Describe your approach. What is good about it? Potential weaknesses? Summarize results. Give an outline of the rest of the paper.
Related Work: Write about other similiar work. What is different than what you did? What is similar? Try to draw general conclusions about what others have missed.
Description of what you did/built: Use pictures and words to show what you did. Be detailed. Think about how to organize what you are doing.
Results: Graphs and tables, all clear and understandable. Full description of each experiment and the results. What conclusions can you draw?
Conclusions: Appropriately drawn from the work described, as general as possible, with a hint of "lessons learned"; what did you get out of the study?
If you plan on using latex (which is great for this sort of thing), click
here for an example Latex template
(in tar format). If you plan on using MS Word, please make sure you know how to generate PDF (and please try to make the paper look a little less ugly than the typical Word document).
Authors of all papers will be expected to provide an
HTML page
containing the
abstract
of and
links
to their paper, and to the
software
and
experimental data
described in their paper. Papers, software, and data will all be collected for inclusion in an electronic version of the symposium.
Note that December 20 is a hard deadline -- no extensions will be given.