The Raven

Summary

The Raven is a utility device that has been frequently discussed on MagicTalk. Opinions vary widely: some say that it is hard to use, and can only be used for a single effect. Others point out that it can in fact be used for a wide variety of effects. By people that use the Raven, there seems to be a consensus that buying extra instructions (like the video) is very worthwhile, because it will give good insight into using the Raven.

Posts

Unfavorable posts about The Raven

By: DJ (stevecaseizgay@hotmail.com)
I just got my Raven a few days ago and I really don't like it. Like many have said it takes alot of setup and it's best if you wear a jacket although you can supposedly do the trick in a shortsleeve shirt but you have to hold your left hand in a very unusual way plus you have to use shimmed coins which aren't exactly cheap. My advice would be to save your money.


By: Gregory Lee (greglee@umich.edu)
I hardly use the Raven; don't like it much. Requires too much setup for a 2 second trick. Also, it helps to wear a jacket, and I rarely wear one. I also had some problems digging around for the fishing line.


By: Michael Cardenas (dragonmike_13@yahoo.com)
Unless you wear a jacket all the time, don't bother. You can do it in a short sleeved shirt but it must have buttons. Save yourself the headaches. It is visually stunning, but not very practical fo impromptu. I mostly stick to sleights (Slydini style) and thumb tips.


By: Olde Rabbit (olderabbit@webtv.net)
With all deference to Chuck, if you purchase the Modern Coin Magic by J.B. Bobo, you will learn hundreds of great coin sleights and tricks. The Raven, and the Bat, only do one trick. therefore, the book is a much better buy. As far as magnets and watches or plastic goes, it usually takes a stronger magnet to foul up a digital watch. and if you keep any magnet in a different pocket from your credit cards, you shouldn't have a problem.


Favorable posts about The Raven

By: Jon A. Hand (jon.hand@n2music.com)

While I personally agree with Ryan and John (Olde Rabbit), what we seem to be considering here is the question: Which is better, sleights or apparatus? I, like many MTers, am a sleight magic devotee and advocate. With the right misdirection and a well-executed sleight, miracles do occur. The sleight of hand magician is the one who often gains in respect, rather than loses, in this era of magic exposure (Fox, et al). A book full of useful sleights, such as Bobo in coins or Royal Road in cards, is far more cost effective than any piece of apparatus.

Does this mean that apparatus is worthless, or not allowable for sleight magicians? I don't think so! There are many sleight of hand ways to vanish a silk, but none so magical-looking as the old-fashioned pull. How many great card effects using double face, double back, or custom-printed cards would be lost if we restrained ourselves to "pure" magic of sleights? Dynamite coin effects like Cap and Pence, Scotch and Soda, Copper/Silver, and Expanded Half tricks would be no more. The wonderful TT tricks would be out of the repertoire. There are definitely times that sleights are not the most magical resource.

The best apparatus magic is those effects which are not "one-trick pieces." Books like 55 Tricks With A Scotch And Soda, 50 Tricks With a Thumb Tip, 75 Tricks With A Stripper/Svengali Deck, Milk Pitcher Magic, etc., highlight the open-ended nature of good apparatus magic. Uses for these items are only limited by one's creativity and imagination.

I don't own either a Bat or a Raven, and have never seen anyone perform with one. The bulk of opinion at MT seems to be with the Raven, if that helps any. Ultimately, a piece of apparatus is merely a tool. If you want, you can let that tool, and others like it, be a crutch. Or, you can use it creatively, imaginatively, judiciously, and sparingly, to perform miracles that sleights cannot do.

Or, to put it more succinctly, one or two good apparatus effects in a sleight routine can make a fine routine even better. The effect in the minds of the audience members is everything. All other professions use tools wisely; magicians should, too.


By: Magic Fett (FETT117@aol.com)
The Raven is a serious utility device. You can do all sorts of stuff with it, vanishing, changing, appearing, and all of this with hands empty before and after. Also, about the 'trick, not magic' comment, the Raven stays where it goes, so you could easily make it a routine. As a magician, I am sure you are familiar with duplicates. Try a coin to impossible location, except do the vanish visually. It's a LOT more than a one trick wonder. Go, buy one. Now. And get the video while you're there. It helps a lot.


By: Chuck (chazpro@aol.com)
While I enjoy the support I receive from all you MTers, and I also agree that a 'good' book is always the best buy, I must disagree with the several mentionings that the Raven and the Bat do only one trick. Between the printed instructions and instructional videos, each item comes with over 20 very differet effects. And because they are utilty items, the number of possible effects are endless. Users have shown this by the number of effects that 'they' constantly create, particularly for the Raven.

It was also mentioned that you can learn a coin vanish that's just as good as the Raven's, in Modern Coin Magic. While I think learning the fundamentals of magic and sleight of hand are better than anything a simple trick can teach, I've yet to see a coin slight, or coin magician, that can perform a coin vanish on the visual level of the Raven via sleight of hand. A retention vanish is close, but is still in a different time zone.

I hope this doesn't sound like an ad, but wanted to correct a couple factual errors that have been posted.


By: aLeXiS GuTieRrEz (agltbialik@aol.com)
Woo Hoo!!! This simple question sure did spark up a very interesting discussion!! Personally, I am an advocate for slieght of hand myself. But I too use gimmicks from time to time. In fact, when I first got started in magic I bought an awful lot of gimmicks. Magnets, gaffed cards, ITR's you name it. But eventually I moved on--plus I ran out of money. I knew better than to RELY on these gimmicks to carry my act. So, I started to practice slieghts and my repetoire practically doubled.

Do I think that we should all disregard the use of gimmicks in exchange for slieght of hand techniques. No. Good slieght of hand is what every performer should aim for. But that doesn't mean that gimmicks don't ever have to be used. A good 'single trick gimmick' can enhance a routine if used correctly. That doesn't mean I think we should all use a gimmick or two in our acts, but if someone else might choose to, then we should try to be supportive.

Since I mentioned the 'single trick' aspect, the Raven and BAT's limitation is only up to the magician performing. They can be used to execute dozens of illusions such as the Scotch and Soda. It's all up to your imagination. I personally have used the BAT to do both vanishes, to move small metal objects on a table top, and to stop watches (though I don't do the last one very often). I can't tell anyone which might be better, because they both have equal pros and cons.

So, I hope that I made a little sense here. I tend to babble sometimes as I am doing so right now. But in short, mastering slieght of hand techniques should be on all of our agendas as performers. However, we shouldn't turn our heads to the more gimmicky tricks.


The discussions on these web pages were extracted from MagicTalk and are therefore Copyright 1998-2003 by Bryan Dean and used with his permission. While this website may be freely read, it may not be freely copied. If you want to copy any of the information from this web site you need to contact Bryan Dean at bryan@magictalk.com to obtain permission.

Back to Index