Re: Love and faithfulness: still reflecting

["Toan" <toan@usa.net>]

Hi anh Hu`ng (et al),

You are correct. Thanks for noticing it.

It should have been <<Phu`ng>>, not <<Ddo^`ng>>.

Also, thank you for the previous response as well. I much agreed with what
you presented. 
Funny, I am from Sai` Go`n, almost delivered in Ba?o Sanh Vie^.n Tu+` Du~.

Again, thanks,

Toa`n
----------
> From: Hung M. La <hung_la@ibm.net>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu>
> Subject: Re: Love and faithfulness: still reflecting
> Date: Saturday, 01 March 1997 9:05 AM
> 
> > Date:          Fri, 28 Feb 1997 23:53:42 -0600 (CST)
> > Reply-to:      vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu
> > From:          "Toan" <toan@usa.net>
> > To:            Multiple recipients of list <vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu>
> > Subject:       Re: Love and faithfulness: still reflecting
> 
> Hi anh Toa`n!
>  You wrote:
> 
> > Nhi`n la^u mo+'i tha^'u: 
> > 
> > Hu+~u duye^n thie^n ly' na(ng tu+o+ng ngo^.
> > Vo^ duye^n ddo^'i die^.n ba^'t tu+o+ng ddo^`ng..
> >                                                                    
^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I read somewhere it was _phu`ng_ (nhu+ trong phu`ng tru`ng  ho^.i 
> ngo^.)
> Hu`ng
>