Re: Ru+`ng Ma('m (pha^`n II)i

[tqd1@cornell.edu]

Hi ca'c Ba'c,
Thanks ba'c Trac very much for posting "Ru-ng Ma('m", it must take you a 
lot of time to let us know a very nice piece of To^ Va(n Tua^'n (tu+'c BNL).
BNL vie^t ru+-ng ma('m tu+- ca?m hu+'ng khi nghe ca'c ca^u chuye^.n cua? 
So+n Nam ke^? ve^- vu-ng Ca- Mau khi o^ng vu+-a tu+- bu+ng ve^- SG.
DDa^y la- truye^.n nga('n hay nha^'t cua? BNL, va- ddu+a o^. tha-nh no^?i 
tie^'ng.
Ca^y ma('m kho^ng pha?i la- ca^y dduo+'c. Ba'c Thanh ti-m ddo.c So+n Nam 
se~ ro~. Trong cuo^.c tie^'n co^ng ra bie^?n, ca^y ma('m la- tie^n phong, 
sau mo+'i dde^'n pho' tuo+'ng la- dduo+'c, ro^-i mo+'i dde^'n su', ve.t.
Ve^- vu. sa(n ca' sa^'u, ddo.c DDa^'t ru-ng phuo+ng Nam cu~ng ly ki- 
cha(?ng ke'm gi- ca'c chuye^.n Westerns, nay DRPN dda~ quay tha-nh phim, 
kho^ng hie^?u co' ca?nh sa(n ca' sa^'u kho^ng?
So+n Nam trong Hu+o+ng Ru+ng Ca- Mau cu~ng co' chye^.n sa(n Ca' Sa^'u, 
cu~ng hay va- ly ki- kho^ng ke'm. Ba'c na-o thi'ch va(n minh mie^.t 
vuo+-n ne^n ti-m ddo.c HRCM cu?a SN.
Cheers,
Tuan.
  

On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Thanh C. Nguyen wrote:

> Ca'c ba'c:
> 
> Ca^y Ma('m co' pha?i co`n ddu+o+c go.i la` ca^y ddu+o+'c hay kho^ng? Theo 
> mo^ ta? trong chuye^.n thi` tha^'y gio^'ng la('m.
> 
> Ddo.c truye^.n na`y la.i nho+' dde^'n truye^.n "Dda^'t ru+`ng phu+o+ng nam"
> (cu?a Doa`n Gio?i thi` pha?i) ddo.c ho^`i co`n be'. Va^~n nho+' nha^'t ddoa.n
> ta? ve^` sa(n ca' sa^'u ba(`ng ca'ch bo+i theo sau ca'i ma?ng co' ngo.n dde`n
> mo+~ ngu+o+`i dde^? nhu+? ca' sa^'u dde^'n ma` dda^m.  Dde^'n gio+` va^~n
> tha('c ma('c cha(?ng hie^?u dda^'y la` chuye^.n tha^.t hay do ta'c gia? nghi~
> ra. 
> 
> -Thanh.
>