Re: Chu+~ "Ta^`n"

[Nam.Nguyen@e-technik.tu-chemnitz.de]

>
>On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Thomas Ngo wrote:
>
>> Ba'c La^m na`y:
>> 
>> Ne^'u chu+~ "Ta^`n" la` te^n go.i nhu" nha` tho+ Cao Ta^`n,
>> thi` chu+~ a^'y co' y' nghi~a gi` va^.y ho+? ba'c?
>> 
>> Trung
>> 
>Ha` ha`, ba'c pha?i ho?i.... ba^.c phu. huynh ba'c Cao Ta^`n cho+' sao la.i
>ho?i nguo+`i du+ng nhu+ tui. Ba'c Cao Ta^`n tha.o chu+~ Ha'n la('m, la.i
>vie^'t chu+~ nho ra^'t dde.p, va^.y tui ddoa'n chu+~ Ta^`n ni la`
>Ha'n-Vie^.t ru`i. Mong ca'c ba'c Vinh, Tie^'n giu'p ba'c Trung mo^.t tay.
>Tui thi` chi? bie^'t Ta^`n trong Ta^`n ta?o tho^i. Co`n Ga` ta^`n vo+'i
>Ta^`n nga^`n thi` cha('c la` No^m qua'.
>
>La^m..
>

Hi,
"Ta^`n" theo to^i la` nhie^`u la^`n, lie^n tie^'p nhu+ trong chu+~ "Ta^`n so^'"
frequency va^.y.  A^m pho^? tho^ng pinyun ba^y gio+` la` "pi'n"..
(Chu+~ Ta^`n so^' ngu+o+`i Ta`u ba^y gio+`go.i la` Ta^`n sua^'t (pi'n lu.))
Hy vo.ng gia? i ddu'ng nghi~a.

Nguyen Nam Trung