[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Li.ch su+? Tu+? vi VN (2) (Gia Ca't Lu+o+.ng)



Hi ca? nha`

Ca'm o*n ba'c Tien Dzung nhie^`u. To^i nho*' ra to^i -du*o*.c xem la' 
so^' Kho^?ng Minh o*? cuo^'n sa'ch ba'c nha('c -de^'n.

Kho^?ng Minh sinh na(m 181, ma^'t na(m 234. Na(m Ta^n Da^.u sa('p 
to*'i la` na(m 1981, lu`i la.i 30 hoa gia'p thi` -de^'n na(m 181.

Co`n cu*?u tru`ng kim -die^.n theo to^i chi? co' nghi~a la` ga^`n 
ba^.c vua chu'a, kie^?u nhu* pho` ta' qua^n vu*o*ng va^.y. Cha('c 
qua^n vu*o*ng ngu*o*`i ta thay the^' ba(`ng cu*?u tru`ng kim -die^.n 
cho no' ke^u vang ho*n thi` pha?i

"Tu*? vi a'o bi'" rie^ng to^i tha^'y kho^ng hay ba(`ng "Tu*? vi ha`m 
so^'" hoa(.c "Tu*? vi ...." (to^i que^n ma^'t te^n) cu?a cu. Thie^n 
Lu*o*ng vie^'t.

The^' ba'c Dzung tie^.n tay cho luo^n ca'c gio*` sinh cua? Lu*u Bi. 
Quan Vu~ Tru*o*ng Phi Ta`o Tha'o Trie^.u Va^n, to^i se~ le^n thu*? 
ba?ng tu*? vi ro^`i chu'ng ta cu`ng ta'n.

Mo*`i ca'c ba'c tie^'p tu.c ba`n.

Tuan
Melbourne, Australia




Nguyen Tien Dzung wrote:
> Halo ca'c ba'c tha^`y bo'i
> 
> Theo quye^?n "Tu+? vi a'o bi'" cu?a Ha` La.c Da~ Phu (Le^ Tu+ Vinh) thi`
> Kho^?ng Minh sinh Na(m Ta^n Da^.u (kho^ng bie^'t theo li.ch Ta^y la` na(m
> na`o ?)
> nga`y 10 tha'ng 4 gio+` Tua^'t, Me^.nh ta.i Mui`. La' so^' o^ng ta co' 
> "Nha^.t Nguye^.t tinh minh ta' cu+?u tru`ng u+ kim ddie^.n Ta? Hu+~u
> ddo^`ng cung,
> Quye^`n Lo^.c Phu+o+.ng Long cu?ng chie^'u"
> 
> Nha^n dda^y xin ddu+o+.c ca'c ba'c chi? gia'o:
> 
> - Ca'i quye^?n "Tu+? vi a'o bi'" tre^n co' to^'t kho^ng ? 
> So vo+i' ca'c quye^?n kha'c thi` the^' na`o?
> 
> - Ta' cu+?u tru`ng u+ kim ddie^.n nghia~ la` gi` ?
> 
> Xin dda ta.
> 
> Zung
> 
> 
> 
> ----------
> > De : Cu Huy Minh Tuan, Melbourne Australia
> <GUEST2@holonic.gse.rmit.EDU.AU>
> > A : Multiple recipients of list <vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu>
> > Objet : Re: Li.ch su+? Tu+? vi VN (2)
> > Datea: jeudi 31 juillet 1997 06:02
> > 
> >   Hi ca'c ba'c 
> >   To^i xin ma.o muo^.i chen va`o va`i ca^u.
> >   
> >   Bac The Hung Nguyen wrote:  
> > > 
> > > Do tui chi? tri'ch (vi` no' da`i qua') chu+' o^ng Ha`i na`y co' 
> > > Nha^.t cu+ Ma~o, Nguye^.t cu+ Ho+.i , Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u
> > > gio^'ng nhu+ so^' cua? Kho^?ng MInh va^.y.
> >   
> >   To^i co' xem so^' Kho^?ng Minh o*? -da^u -do' ro^`i thi` pha?i. La' 
> > so^' to^i -du*o*.c xem co' Me^.nh ta.i Mu`i. Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u thi` 
> > la`m sao co' Nguye^.t ta.i Ho*.i chie^'u va`o -du*o*.c
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >2/ Ca^u " dda.i ha.n o+? cung ty', Ma~ ga(.p Dda` la...." nghi~a la` 
> > > gi` ???. Cu+' theo ca^u na`y ma` xe't thi` co' the^? hie^?u la` : Ma~ 
> > > cu~ng o+? trong cung ty'. 
> > > 
> > > Ca^u na`y xin ddu+o+.c kha^'t dde^? tui  ve^` xem la.i dda~
> > 
> >   Ma~ kho^ng bao gio*` o*? cung Ty' nhu*ng sao lu*u Ma~ co' the^? o*? 
> > cung Ty'
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers.
> > > 
>