Re: Phe^ bi`nh ba`i phe^ bi`nh cu?a Tra^`n Ma.nh Ha?o

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet2@yahoo.com>]

Hi Hai,

   Very well phrased!

--- AnHai Doan <anhai@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
> These morally unacceptable things are proliferating
> in Vietnam. "DDa.o ddu+'c suy ddo^`i, xa~ ho^.i suy
> thoa'i" is one of the phrases commonly used to refer to this
phenomenon. A good portion of Vietnamese literature has addressed this
phenomenon. 
>
  
   This is exactly what I am worried about. It seems to me that the
descriptions of moral corruptions are not impressive and sellable any
more. The cheap market needs theory or phylosophy to justify these.
This is disgusting to me. I don't really care if they describe dirty
scenes. As I said it is not easy to justify in literature, so it is not
good idea to ban based on an individual perception. however, there
should be somebody to raise voice against this.

> or they seem to glorify and justify it, using
> whatever ta? pi' lu` reasons/theory they can come up
> with.

  Good comparison.

>Like Hollywood products, they
> should be allowed, but so should be their cricitism, no matter coming
from whom.
>
  
   I can speculate a scenario when I see Tran Manh Hao's thinking as
consistent. I guess it is also consisten with what you wrote.

> Rather, his main point is merely the wonder if CHCC is not one such
glorifying and justifying product. If so, he is concerned that the
attention that it gets and the influence that it yields can contribute
to further glorying and justifying moral corruption, which is already
pervalent in today society. He did make his point, and he is not alone
with that.
>>

Cheers
Aiviet
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com