[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Vo^ la.i
Cha`o ca'c ba'c!
Vo+'i "lu+o+ng na(ng bi`nh da^n" to^i tha^'y "vo^ la.i" o+?
da^y kho' nghe la('m. No'i chung da'nh ke? cha.y di kho^ng ai da'nh
ngu+o+`i cha.y la.i,
H.
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Tuan Pham wrote:
> >co' the^? goi.i mo^.t ngu+o+i` vie^'t la` do^'t, la` do+~, la` chu+a pha't
> >trie^?n ... nhu+ng nha^n
> >ca'ch va` cuo^.c ddo+`i cu?a ho. la` ngoa`i va^'n dde^`.
> >
>
> Hi ba'c KyPhong
>
> Co`n tu`y chu+~ "vo^ la.i" ddang no'i ve^` ca'i gi`.
> Cha(?ng ha.n ddang no'i ve^` boxing, ne^'u ta phe^ bi`nh
> Mike Tyson la` vo^ la.i vi` ngu? vo+'i ga'i vi. tha`nh
> nie^n thi` ddo' la` chuye^.n irrelevant, kho^ng ne^n no'i.
> Nhu+ng ne^'u ba?o anh ta vo^ la.i vi` ca('n tai ddi.ch thu?,
> hay vi` dda^'m va`o ha. bo^., hay vi` dda^'m sau khi
> chuo^ng reo, thi` hoa`n toa`n relevant va` co' quye^`n che^.
>
> Cheers
> Tuan Pham
>
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Vo^ la.i
- From: Alexander H L Vu <vuh000@mail.Uni-Mainz.DE>