Re: Vo^ la.i

["kyphong" <KyPhong@erols.com>]

From: Tuan Pham <Tuan.Pham@unsw.edu.au>
Subject: RE: Vo^ la.i


>Hi ba'c KyPhong
>
>Co`n tu`y chu+~ "vo^ la.i" ddang no'i ve^` ca'i gi`.
>Cha(?ng ha.n ddang no'i ve^` boxing, ne^'u ta phe^ bi`nh
>Mike Tyson la` vo^ la.i vi` ngu? vo+'i ga'i vi. tha`nh
>nie^n thi` ddo' la` chuye^.n irrelevant, kho^ng ne^n no'i.
>Nhu+ng ne^'u ba?o anh ta vo^ la.i vi` ca('n tai ddi.ch thu?,
>hay vi` dda^'m va`o ha. bo^., hay vi` dda^'m sau khi
>chuo^ng reo, thi` hoa`n toa`n relevant va` co' quye^`n che^.
>
>Cheers
>Tuan Pham
***************
Trong tru+o+`ng ho+.p na`y, xa`i chu+~ vo^ la.i (vo^ loa.i) la` sai.
   Vo^ loa.i (hay vo^ la.i) ddu+o+.c ddi.nh nghi~a la` kho^ng xu+'ng dda'ng
trong xa~ ho^.i,
kho^ng gio^'ng ai trong cu`ng ta^`ng lo+'p (loa`i ngu+o+`i).
    Vo+'i to^i, chu+~ vo^ la.i la` chu+~ ta^.n cu`ng ma` chu'ng ta co' the^?
ga'n cho mo^.t nguo+`i.
     Trong VNSA, to^i nghi~ chu'n g ta chu+a ddi dde^'n giai ddo.an ddo'.
     Ti`nh Tha^n,
     NKP