Re: Traffic Problems

[Sonnet Nguyen <sonnet@white.cft.edu.pl>]

Hi ba'c DX et al,
DDo.c la.i 2 la^`n ba`i cu~ tha^'y lo^~i toe toe't ca?. To^i su+?a 
ro^`i, ne^'u va^~n co`n va`i lo^~i trong text thi` ca'c ba'c vui 
lo`ng su+?a ho^. nhe'.  Hope that my text is comprehensible also 
for people, those do not understand a word in English :-))
Anyway, I need an intelligent translator which can translate quickly
my thoughts into arbitrary languague :-)) 
Thanks,
SN
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 14:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sonnet Nguyen <sonnet@white.cft.edu.pl>

Hi d/c AV & lovers of Games,

I'd like to inform you: Mr. Aiviet gived me an acceptable model 
(and some speculations for the next) and he won 1/2 champagne 
bottle and a title "smart guy" from me :-))  
Why he won only 1/2 bottle ? 
Because his model is too primitive which requires general improvements, 
furthermore his design style is unproper :-)
  Speculations of TA are out of the context, so no comment of 
mine is needed :-)
In fact, only  AV's second model is worthy for my comments, 
because the third is not yet finished, the first (namely social model, 
V.H.L, banana, B.A.V. or whatever you want:-) is unrealistic and ...
dangerous. Why the model is dangerous ? 
For example, in reality there is something known as "driver's 
reaction time" (I define it as a necessary time for a dviver to 
notice the break lights of the car in the front of him).  
Independently from a model, the safety distance between cars 
always must be larger (at least) than : 
        (Reaction Time) * (Actual Velocity).  
It means the safety distance must increase more quickly (or at least 
equally) than linearly to the velocity.  For a flow of high speed 
cars (typical: 65 mph in USA, 130 kmph in Europe) the public safety 
demands ... small car's density.