RE: Hie^.p U*o*'c Ma^.u Di.ch (HUMD) Vie^.t My?

[NGUYEN Hong Thach <thach@coombs.anu.edu.au>]

On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Hoang Nguyen wrote:
> To^i ddo^`ng y' vo+'i ba'c Tha.ch la` "Pha?i xem ca'i
> mi`nh ky' la` ca'i gi` chu+'."
..........
> Trong tho+`i dda.i ca'ch ma.ng tin ho.c va` thu+o+ng
> ma.i ddie^.n tu+? ho^m nay, 1 phu't ddu+'ng ngoa`i la`
> 1 phu't thua thie^.t. 

Hi ba'c Hoa`ng et all,

Ba'c co' tha^'y two of your points conflict each other khong?

>  Tuy nhie^n, ca'i HUMD
> na`y 2 chi'nh quye^`n (phi'a ha`nh pha'p) VN va` My~
> dda~ ba`n ca?i tha?o lua^.n trong ga^`n 4 na(m qua. 
> Dde^'n lu'c 2 chi'nh quye^`n dda~ ddo^`ng y' tre^n
> nguye^n ta('c va` vie^'t xuo^'ng gia^'y tra('ng mu+.c
> dden thi` 1 be^n la.i muo^'n suy nghi~ la.i.  Nhu+
> va^.y thi` ba`n ca?i tha?o lua^.n 4 na(m qua dde^?
> la`m gi`? 

Chuye^.n ba`n xong kho^ng ky' ddu+o+.c hay ky' xong kho^ng tho^ng qua 
ddu+o+.c la` chuye^.n thu+o+`ng ti`nh la*'m ba'c Hoa`ng a`. Ba'c tha^'y 
Senate My~ vu+`a ro^`i cu~ng co' tho^ng qua Nuclear Ban treaty dda^u, 
tha^.m chi' embarass Cliton la` gi`.

DDu'ng la` chu'ng ta kho' ba`n ta.i sao HDTM chu+a ky' ddu+o+.c vi` 
thie^'u tho^ng tin va` vi` "te^' nhi." vv... Nhu+ng mo^.t khi chu'ng ta 
kho^ng hoa*.c chu+a ba`n ddu+o+.c ma` pha'n thi`... kho' thuye^'t phu.c 
la*'m/.

> ne^'u VN bo? lo+? co+ ho^.i ky' HUMD VN-My va` gia
> nha^.p World Trade Organization ngay, pha?i cha^.m
> cha^n ma^'t 3-4 na(m thi` ddo' la` 1 thie^.t tho`i
> lo+'n lao cho VN.

Nhu+ng ne^'u ba'c ky' vo+'i mo^.t ddie^`u kie^.n ba^'t lo+.i thi` co' 
pha?i la` "thie^.t tho`i lo+'n lao" kho^ng?

To^i la^'y vi' du. mo^.t khi ba'c pha?i mo+? tung ta^'t ca? mo.i cu+?a 
ma` ngu+o+`i ba'c ye^'u kha? na*ng ba'c nga~ be^.nh na*.ng la` ra^'t cao 
thi` ba'c co' mo+? toang he^'t cu+?a kho^ng, hay ba'c mo+? tu+` tu+` cho 
co' kho^ng khi' trong la`nh, nhu+ng cu~ng kho^ng ga^y ca?m ddo^.t ngo^.t.

Cheers,
Thach