system industry ftth telecommunications founded lafayette louisiana u.s. 2004 2004 headquarters lafayette united states area served city of lafayette key people joey durel terry huval services cable television broadband internet telephone owner lafayette utilities system website http lusfiber.com lusfiber is a municipally owned subsidiary of lafayette utilities system providing cable television broadband internet and telephone services to the citizens of lafayette louisiana . it is notable for being the first municipally owned company providing fiber to the home services in the state of louisiana and one of the first municipally owned ftth companies in the country . history edit this section does not cite any sources . please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources . unsourced material may be challenged and removed . february 2011 learn how and when to remove this template message in the late 1990s the lafayette utilities system the municipally owned utilities company needed to upgrade its outdated microwave system for connecting their substations . lus chose to upgrade with fiber optic technology . in 2002 after installing the system for their needs they used the surplus fiber optic strands to provide wholesale service to hospitals universities and the lafayette parish school system . in 2003 during the campaign for city parish president candidate joey durel expressed in a chamber of commerce debate with his opponent that he would not be in favor of lus competing in the private sector . this statement was made on more than one occasion . however once taking office joey durel led the charge for a citywide fiber to the premise initiative . as he often said i begged the private sector to do it so that we wouldn t have to . with the incumbents refusing local government was the only option . in 2004 the city announced its proposal for a municipal fiber network providing broadband internet cable tv telephone services to the city of lafayette . 70 percent of residents and 80 percent of businesses responded positively to a market survey conducted by lus . this was not a scientific poll . the questions asked and the raw results of the telephone poll were requested by interested parties in the public but were never released . the announcement of the project came within 4 months of durel s inauguration just one day after the closing of submission of new bills in the state legislature . this would presumably prevent a challenge in the state legislature by the incumbent phone and cable provider as there are many laws on the books regulating phone and cable tv providers but no laws regulating a local municipality entering such business sectors . representatives from the ilec incumbent local exchange provider bellsouth now at & t were able to lobby representatives in the legislature to modify an existing bill since new bills could no longer be submitted to establish rules that would allow some regulation over a municipal entity entering into telecommunications . prior to this there were no laws on the books preventing a municipal entity from subsidizing a telecom business with proceeds from a true monopoly utility system such as the monopoly utility system operated by the city of lafayette . this bill negotiated between representatives from bellsouth cox communications lus and reportedly governor kathleen blanco herself became the local government fair competition act of 2004 . as per the requirements of local government fair competition act lgfca lus conducted a feasibility study and presented the study in november 2004 . the lafayette city parish council voted to adopt the study and proceed with the sale of bonds by resolution in december 2004 and opted to forgo a referendum . this resolution resulted in a petition for a referendum in january 2005 and a subsequent lawsuit in february . the petition was conducted by a non profit group calling themselves fiber411.com . the group was founded by 3 citizens of lafayette who spoke out at the public hearings against the feasibility study and later joined by other volunteers and concerned citizens . while some accused the group of being shills for bellsouth and cox the three were of backgrounds in oil and gas leasing home building and oilfield engineering respectively had never met prior to november 2004 and had no ties to the communications industry nor local government . the petition was participated in by members of fiber411.com and community volunteers as well as volunteers from bellsouth and cox . the petition was highly contested by the administration and was ultimately not recognized as a valid petition . fiber411.com being a volunteer group decided not to sue to enforce the petition due to lack of funds . bellsouth filed suit over the petition and won . the decision was based on the judge s determination that the city had used the incorrect set of louisiana state laws to seek sale of bonds that precluded a referendum mechanism . the district court decision further ruled that the petition used by fiber411 was written to appeal to the correct set of state laws that the city should have been using . the city of lafayette then had to decide if it would try again for to sell bonds with or without a referendum . the city decided to have a referendum . the council members of the city parish government prior to 2005 had stated that they did not want a media bloodbath between the city and he incumbents and that was their reason to deny a referendum . in the end the city of lafayette spent undisclosed sums to host a series of town hall meetings where it actively promoted the fiber project . local political action committees calling themselves lafayetteyes and lafayettecomingtogether made up largely of political allies of the administration consultants etc. raised and spent over 300 000 for media campaigns . fiber411.com spent approximately 10 000 and bellsouth spent less than 5 000 . cox spent 0.00 on the campaign . as such the media campaign was very one sided . on july 16 2005 the proposal was put to a vote . in a low turnout special election by a margin of 62 % for and 38 % against the residents of lafayette approved of the city s plan . the city s legal troubles weren t over however . in order to raise money for the project the city had to borrow money through tax exempt bonds . again the state cable association and bellsouth sued lafayette alleging the bond ordinance didn t comply with state law . the suit was won by the city in district court but an appellate court panel ruled 3 0 that the city s ordinance to sell bonds violated the local government fair competition act s requirement that the money to fund the fiber project must not be subsidized by funds from the existing utilities system . lafayette followed up the court loss with a new ordinance that amended the original . two citizens of lafayette sued known as elizabeth naqui et al. as well as bellsouth . bellsouth inexplicably declined to pay court costs for submission of the suit and ended up dropping the suit . naquin et al. remained . lus won in district court but the appeals court again decided 3 0 that the city s ordinance violated the local government fair competition act in a similar manner as the original ordinance thereby allowing the city to illegally use funds from utilities customers to pay for services for telecom subscribers . this time the city appealed to the louisiana state supreme court . the high court decided that the appeals court s ruling to enjoin prevent the city from selling bonds was based on a brief that was filed too late . when the high court threw out this brief the argument that had succeeded in appeals court was no longer allowed and thus the state supreme court reversed the appeals court s decision . this allowed the city to proceed with the sale of the bonds to fund the project . in 2007 lafayette was finally able to start issuing bonds . construction started in 2008 on the network and the first customers were receiving service in february 2009 . services edit lusfiber provides what it calls vip service video internet phone triple play services . the company provides basic analog cable along with a digital option . they offer hd tv dvr video on demand and pay per view with the digital option . they also offer their tv web portal . the portal allows users limited access to the internet through the tv without the use of a computer . broadband internet is provided to homes and businesses from 3mbps to 2000mbit s. 1 the service is symmetrical meaning the download and upload speeds are the same . many current telecommunication companies provide asymmetrical speeds having a high download speed and lower upload speed . lus s fiber network also allows for peer to peer transfers at speeds up to 1000mbit s for all of its internet service customers . references edit http lusfiber.com index.php internet pricing guide official homepage governing.com article on lafayette s fiber struggle internet quest gets squashed an illinois city using lafayette as an example blog covering the project early on broadband competition cajun style boston globe may 23 2015 retrieved from https en.wikipedia.org w index.php title lusfiber & oldid 718538792 categories public utilities of the united statestelecommunications companies of the united stateshidden categories articles needing additional references from february 2011all articles needing additional references navigation menu personal tools not logged intalkcontributionscreate accountlog in namespaces article talk variants views read edit view history more search navigation main pagecontentsfeatured contentcurrent eventsrandom articledonate to wikipediawikipedia store interaction helpabout wikipediacommunity portalrecent changescontact page tools what links hererelated changesupload filespecial pagespermanent linkpage informationwikidata itemcite this page print export create a bookdownload as pdfprintable version languages add links this page was last modified on 4 may 2016 at 03 19 . text is available under the creative commons attribution sharealike license ; additional terms may apply . by using this site you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy . wikipedia is a registered trademark of the wikimedia foundation inc. a non profit organization . privacy policy about wikipedia disclaimers contact wikipedia developers cookie statement mobile view