	The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence makes some tenuous arguments, to say the least, on the readiness
and efficacy of AI policing the populace within the next 15 years.

	While the use of cameras to both solve and prevent crimes is widely prevalent today, it takes a leap of faith to assume 
that within 15 years the typical North American city will have adopted some form of AI to manage all this data. For laws to have
been passed to allow such systems to exist would mean that the public has approved of AI for some time, and for a 15-year
timespan that doesnt sound reasonable. Even if the technology were capable say 10 years from now to enable public opinion to
change and then laws to be passed, theres still the ethical dilemma that many in the public will face in whether or not they
wish to exchange some part of their privacy for added security.  Based off the relatively recent events with the NSA spying on 
the public, a lot of people are likely hesitant to agree to  the government constantly monitoring them via cameras and social
media. 

	The studys assertions on AI preventing crime by profiling also proves troublesome. No matter how its sliced, such a 
system would have some sort of bias that weights some behavior as more dangerous than other and as such targets certain groups
of people. While profiling is near impossible to prevent no matter who monitors the data, if an AI is implemented the profiling
will have a far greater reach. When first implemented itd likely be used for additional screening at airports, however, a
dangerous precedent could be set that could lead to a path of increasing pervasiveness of a police state. 

	The implementation of AI that sorts through social media would also be very difficult. Its challenging enough to pick 
up intent based off of changes in intonation when someone is speaking, but telling the difference between seriousness and sarcasm
from text only would be near impossible for AI. To allow an AI that struggles to detect such nuances to scan all this data to
identify those at risk to potential terrorist groups or even those in terrorist groups is reckless. Not only that but it would be
foolish to assume such a technology would forever remain exclusive to the state and if it fell into the hands of a group with ill
intentions could prove disastrous. 

	While AI poses a myriad of applications for maintaining public order, theyre likely still greater than 15 years in the 
future. The more likely path to occur is within the next 15 years a policing AI could exist within an academic setting. From there
studies would occur on the effectiveness of the AI versus a human police force and then the public would have to decide if the 
technology has been ironed out enough and if the tradeoff in privacy for security is worth it. For a typical North American city
like Chicago to then implement this system is likely at best 25 years away.