This chapter describes SWIG's support of CHICKEN. CHICKEN is a Scheme-to-C compiler supporting most of the language features as defined in the Revised^5 Report on Scheme. Its main attributes are that it
When confronted with a large C library, CHICKEN users can use SWIG to generate CHICKEN wrappers for the C library. However, the real advantages of using SWIG with CHICKEN are its support for C++ -- object-oriented code is difficult to wrap by hand in CHICKEN -- and its typed pointer representation, essential for C and C++ libraries involving structures or classes.
CHICKEN support was introduced to SWIG in version 1.3.18. SWIG relies on some recent additions to CHICKEN, which are only present in releases of CHICKEN with version number greater than or equal to 1.89. To use a chicken version between 1.40 and 1.89, see the Garbage collection section below.
You may want to look at any of the examples in Examples/chicken/ or Examples/GIFPlot/Chicken for the basic steps to run SWIG CHICKEN.
To run SWIG CHICKEN in C mode, use the -chicken option.
% swig -chicken example.i
To allow the wrapper to take advantage of future CHICKEN code generation improvements, part of the wrapper is direct CHICKEN function calls (example_wrap.c) and part is CHICKEN Scheme (example.scm). The basic Scheme code must be compiled to C using your system's CHICKEN compiler or both files can be compiled directly using the much simpler csc.
% chicken example.scm -output-file oexample.c
So for the C mode of SWIG CHICKEN, example_wrap.c and oexample.c are the files that must be compiled to object files and linked into your project.
To run SWIG CHICKEN in C++ mode, use the -chicken -c++ option.
% swig -chicken -c++ example.i
This will generate example_wrap.cxx and example.scm. The basic Scheme code must be compiled to C using your system's CHICKEN compiler or both files can be compiled directly using the much simpler csc.
% chicken example.scm -output-file oexample.c
So for the C++ mode of SWIG CHICKEN, example_wrap.cxx and oexample.c are the files that must be compiled to object files and linked into your project.
Given a C variable, function or constant declaration named Foo_Bar, the declaration will be available in CHICKEN as an identifier ending with Foo-Bar. That is, an underscore is converted to a dash.
You may control what the CHICKEN identifier will be by using the %rename SWIG directive in the SWIG interface file.
The name of the module must be declared one of two ways:
The generated example.scm file then exports (declare (unit modulename))
.
If you do not want SWIG to export the (declare (unit modulename))
, pass
the -nounit option to SWIG.
CHICKEN will be able to access the module using the (declare
(uses modulename))
CHICKEN Scheme form.
Constants may be created using any of the four constructs in the interface file:
#define MYCONSTANT1 ...
%constant int MYCONSTANT2 = ...
const int MYCONSTANT3 = ...
enum { MYCONSTANT4 = ... };
In all cases, the constants may be accessed from with CHICKEN using the form (MYCONSTANT1); that is, the constants may be accessed using the read-only parameter form.
Variables are accessed using the full parameter form. For example, to set the C variable "int my_variable;", use the Scheme form (my-variable 2345). To get the C variable, use (my-variable).
C functions declared in the SWIG interface file will have
corresponding CHICKEN Scheme procedures. For example, the C
function "int sqrt(double x);" will be available using the
Scheme form (sqrt 2345.0). A void
return
value will give C_SCHEME_UNDEFINED as a result.
A function may return more than one value by using the
OUTPUT
specifier (see Lib/chicken/typemaps.i).
They will be returned as a Scheme list if there is more than one
result (that is, a non-void return value and at least one argout
parameter, or a void return value and at least two argout
parameters).
The SWIG chicken module has support for exceptions thrown from C or C++ code to be caught in scheme. See Exception handling with %exception for more information about declaring exceptions in the interface file.
Chicken supports both the SWIG_exception(int code, const char *msg)
interface
as well as a SWIG_ThrowException(C_word val)
function for throwing exceptions from
inside the %exception blocks. SWIG_exception
will throw a list consiting of the code
(as an integer) and the message. Both of these will throw an exception using (abort)
,
which can be handled by (handle-exceptions)
. See
Chicken manual on Exceptions
and SFRI-12. Since the exception values are thrown
directly, if (condition-case)
is used to catch an exception the exception will come through in the val ()
case.
The following simple module
%module exception_test %inline %{ void test_throw(int i) throws (int) { if (i == 1) throw 15; } %}
could be run with
(handle-exceptions exvar (if (= exvar 15) (print "Correct!") (print "Threw something else " exvar)) (test-throw 1))
The author of TinyCLOS, Gregor Kiczales, describes TinyCLOS as: "Tiny CLOS is a Scheme implementation of a `kernelized' CLOS, with a metaobject protocol. The implementation is even simpler than the simple CLOS found in `The Art of the Metaobject Protocol,' weighing in at around 850 lines of code, including (some) comments and documentation."
Almost all good Scheme books describe how to use metaobjects and generic procedures to implement an object-oriented Scheme system. Please consult a Scheme book if you are unfamiliar with the concept.
CHICKEN has a modified version of TinyCLOS, which SWIG CHICKEN uses if the -proxy argument is given. If -proxy is passed, then the generated example.scm file will contain TinyCLOS class definitions. A class named Foo is declared as <Foo>, and each member variable is allocated a slot. Member functions are exported as generic functions.
Primitive symbols and functions (the interface that would be presented if -proxy was not passed) are hidden and no longer accessable. If the -unhideprimitive command line argument is passed to SWIG, then the primitive symbols will be available, but each will be prefixed by the string "primitive:"
The exported symbol names can be controlled with the -closprefix and -useclassprefix arguments. If -useclassprefix is passed to SWIG, every member function will be generated with the class name as a prefix. If the -closprefix mymod: argument is passed to SWIG, then the exported functions will be prefixed by the string "mymod:". If -useclassprefix is passed, -closprefix is ignored.
Please refer to CHICKEN - A practical and portable Scheme system - User's manual for detailed help on how to link object files to create a CHICKEN Scheme program. Briefly, to link object files, be sure to add `chicken-config -extra-libs -libs` or `chicken-config -shared -extra-libs -libs`to your linker options. Use the -shared option if you want to create a dynamically loadable module. You might also want to use the much simpler csc or csc.bat.
Each scheme file that is generated
by SWIG contains (declare (uses modname))
. This means that to load the
module from scheme code, the code must include (declare (uses modname))
.
We can easily use csc to build a static binary.
$ swig -chicken example.i $ csc -v example.scm example_impl.c example_wrap.c test_script.scm -o example $ ./example
Similar to the above, any number of module.scm files could be compiled into a shared library, and then that shared library linked when compiling the main application.
$ swig -chicken example.i $ csc -sv example.scm example_wrap.c example_impl.c -o example.so
The exmaple.so file can then linked with test_script.scm when it
is compiled, in which case test_script.scm must have (declare (uses example))
.
Multiple SWIG modules could have been linked into example.so and each
one accessed with a (declare (uses ... ))
.
$ csc -v test_script.scm -lexample
An alternative is the test_script.scm can have the code (load-library 'example "example.so")
,
in which case the test script does not need to be linked with example.so. The test_script.scm file can then
be run with csi.
Building a shared library like in the above section only works if the library
is linked at compile time with a script containing (declare (uses ...))
or is
loaded explictetly with (load-library 'example "example.so")
. It is
not the format that chicken expects for extension libraries and eggs. The problem is the
(declare (unit modname))
inside the modname.scm file. There are
two possible solutions to this.
First, SWIG accepts a -nounit argument, in which case the (declare (unit modname))
is not generated. Then, the modname.scm and modname_wrap.c files must be compiled into
their own shared library.
$ csc -sv modname.scm modname_wrap.c modname_impl.c -o modname.so
This library can then be loaded by scheme code with the (require 'modname)
function.
See
Loading-extension-libraries in the eval unit inside the Chicken manual for more information.
Another alternative is to run SWIG normally and create a scheme file that contains (declare (uses modname))
and then compile that file into the shared library as well. For example, inside the mod_load.scm file,
(declare (uses mod1)) (declare (uses mod2))
Which would then be compiled with
$ swig -chicken mod1.i $ swig -chicken mod2.i $ csc -sv mod_load.scm mod1.scm mod2.scm mod1_wrap.c mod2_wrap.c mod1_impl.c mod2_impl.c -o mod.so
Then the extension library can be loaded with (require 'mod)
. As we can see here,
mod_load.scm contains the code that gets exectued when the module is loaded. All this code
does is load both mod1 and mod2. As we can see, this technique is more useful when you want to
combine a few SWIG modules into one chicken extension library, especially if modules are related by
%import
In either method, the files that are compiled into the shared library could also be packaged into an egg. The mod1_wrap.c and mod2_wrap.c files that are created by SWIG are stand alone and do not need SWIG to be installed to be compiled. Thus the egg could be distributed and used by anyone, even if SWIG is not installed.
See the Examples/chicken/egg directory in the SWIG source for an example that builds two eggs, one using the first method and one using the second method.
Linking together multiple modules that share type information using the %import
directive while also using -proxy is more complicated. For example, if mod2.i imports mod1.i, then the
mod2.scm file contains references to symbols declared in mod1.scm,
and thus a (declare (uses mod1))
or (require 'mod1)
must be exported
to the top of mod2.scm. By default, when SWIG encounters an %import "modname.i"
directive,
it exports (declare (uses modname))
into the scm file. This works fine unless mod1 was compiled with
the -nounit argument or was compiled into an extension library with other modules under a different name.
One option is to override the automatic generation of (declare (uses mod1))
by passing the -noclosuses option to SWIG when compiling mod2.i.
SWIG then provides the %insert(closprefix) %{ %}
directive. Any scheme code inside that directive is inserted into the
generated .scm file, and if mod1 was compiled with -nounit, the directive should contain (require 'mod1)
.
This option allows for mixed loading as well, where some modules are imported with (declare (uses modname))
(which means they were compiled without -nounit) and some are imported with (require 'modname)
.
The other option is to use the second idea in the above section. Compile all the modules normally, without any
%insert(closprefix)
, -nounit, or -noclosuses. Then the modules will import each other correctly
with (declare (uses ...))
.
To create an extension library or an egg, just create a module_load.scm file that (declare (uses ...))
all the modules.
The Chicken module handles all types via typemaps. This information is
read from Lib/chicken/typemaps.i
and
Lib/chicken/chicken.swg
.
For pointer types, SWIG uses CHICKEN tagged pointers. A tagged pointer is an ordinary CHICKEN pointer with an extra slot for a void *. With SWIG CHICKEN, this void * is a pointer to a type-info structure. So each pointer used as input or output from the SWIG-generated CHICKEN wrappers will have type information attached to it. This will let the wrappers correctly determine which method should be called according to the object type hierarchy exposed in the SWIG interface files.
To construct a Scheme object from a C pointer, the wrapper code
calls the function
SWIG_NewPointerObj(void *ptr, swig_type_info *type, int owner)
,
The function that calls SWIG_NewPointerObj
must have a variable declared
C_word *known_space = C_alloc(C_SIZEOF_SWIG_POINTER);
It is ok to call SWIG_NewPointerObj
more than once,
just make sure known_space has enough space for all the created pointers.
To get the pointer represented by a CHICKEN tagged pointer, the
wrapper code calls the function
SWIG_ConvertPtr(C_word s, void **result, swig_type_info *type, int flags)
,
passing a pointer to a struct representing the expected pointer
type. flags is either zero or SWIG_POINTER_DISOWN (see below).
If the owner flag passed to SWIG_NewPointerObj
is 1, NewPointerObj
will add a
finalizer to the type which will call the destructor or delete method of
that type. The destructor and delete functions are no longer exported for
use in scheme code, instead SWIG and chicken manage pointers.
In situations where SWIG knows that a function is returning a type that should
be garbage collected, SWIG will automaticly set the owner flag to 1. For other functions,
the %newobject
directive must be specified for functions whose return values
should be garbage collected. See
Object ownership and %newobject for more information.
In situations where a C or C++ function will assume ownership of a pointer, and thus
chicken should no longer garbage collect it, SWIG provides the DISOWN
input typemap.
After applying this typemap (see the Typemaps chapter for more information on how to apply typemaps),
any pointer that gets passed in will no longer be garbage collected.
An object is disowned by passing the SWIG_POINTER_DISOWN
flag to SWIG_ConvertPtr
.
Warning: Since the lifetime of the object is now controlled by the underlying code, the object might
get deleted while the scheme code still holds a pointer to it. Further use of this pointer
can lead to a crash.
Adding a finalizer function from C code was added to chicken in the 1.89 release, so garbage collection
does not work for chicken versions below 1.89. If you would like the SWIG generated code to work with
chicken 1.40 to 1.89, pass the -nocollection
argument to SWIG. This will not export code
inside the _wrap.c file to register finalizers, and will then export destructor functions which
must be called manually.
TinyCLOS has a limitation such that generic methods do not properly work on methods with different number of specializers: TinyCLOS assumes that every method added to a generic function will have the same number of specializers. SWIG generates functions with different lengths of specializers when C/C++ functions are overloaded. For example, the code
class Foo {}; int foo(int a, Foo *b); int foo(int a);
will produce scheme code
(define-method (foo (arg0 <top>) (arg1 <Foo>)) (call primitive function)) (define-method (foo (arg0 <top>)) (call primitive function))
Using unpatched TinyCLOS, the second (define-method)
will replace the first one,
so calling (foo 3 f)
will produce an error.
There are two solutions to this: the file Lib/chicken/tinyclos-multi-generic.patch in the SWIG source contains a patch against tinyclos.scm inside the chicken source to add support into TinyCLOS for multi-argument generics. This requires chicken to be rebuilt and custom install of chicken. An alternative is the Lib/chicken/multi-generic.scm file in the SWIG source. This file can be loaded after TinyCLOS is loaded, and it will override some functions inside TinyCLOS to correctly support multi-argument generics. This solution will work on any install of chicken. Please see the comments at the top of both files for more information.