Doom 3: Resurrection of Evil PC
- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Apr 4, 2005
- Also On: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360

- Summary:
- Developer: Nerve Software
- Genre(s): Action
- # of players: 8 Online
- Cheats: On GameFAQs
- More Details and Credits »
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 34 out of 46
-
Mixed: 11 out of 46
-
Negative: 1 out of 46
-
The game we were all hoping Doom 3 was going to be in the first place. It just took a few more months and the help of Nerve Software to get there. The difficulty is much higher now, but with the added power of the double-barrel shotgun and the innovative uses of the grabber, plus the insanely cool artifact gameplay balances out nicely.
-
The multiplayer has improved with the introduction of this expansion pack and I am truly amazed at how fluid this game runs even with eight players on a high speed connection.
-
Pelit (Finland)Delivers more of the same Doom experience. Doom 3's ubiquitous darkness and monsters that spawn behind your back have not gone to hell where they belong. But would it be the same without them? [May. 05]
-
Computer Gaming WorldMore monsters to kill and guns to shoot them with. You were expecting, maybe, a love story? [Aug 2005, p.72]
-
Resurrection of Evil ultimately fails on innovation but perhaps just as importantly succeeds with expansion. It’s more of the same, for better or for worse.
-
If you liked Doom 3, then you’ll love the expansion pack. However, if you felt the game got a bit old and hated the flashlight/gun game play mechanism, there’s nothing new here to win you over.
-
netjakResurrection of Evil even failed to match the atmosphere of the previous title and is little more than eye-candy without any flavor. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 42
-
Mixed: 7 out of 42
-
Negative: 22 out of 42
-
Sep 21, 2010
-
-
KevinSDec 28, 2009
-
-
JoggeriJun 4, 2005Nice... not great but better than most shooters.
-
-
JamieS.Jun 5, 2005
-
-
JeffS.Jun 27, 2005
-
-
s.kApr 15, 2005I have to say that this game is really bad. I paid 60$ for this game , it isn´t worth a dollar. Same sh.. just shorter.
-
-
AndyDennisMar 30, 2005
-