Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight PC

1. SamuelK

   Mar 23, 2010

   10

   Despite what other users said I think that this game is completly worth your time and money. It is indeeed not like her ancestors. But all Despite what other users said I think that this game is completly worth your time and money. It is indeeed not like her ancestors. But all the action gameplay, crawlers, cooperation between players needed, balanced units... This game isn't bad it's DIFFERENT. You either move along and enjoy epic battles or if you don't like it go and play something else. Would you like to rather have copy of previous CnC games (which were copied by almost all of RTS) with new graphics? Or you prefer something new, something you could explore, something fast but tactical, something different?… Expand

   • 6 of 31 users found this helpful
2. linkin0213

   Dec 19, 2012

   5

   It was a bad game Command & Conquer series of large kedvencem.A biggest negative is that the material removed from the construction proceedsIt was a bad game Command & Conquer series of large kedvencem.A biggest negative is that the material removed from the construction proceeds think it really should not have.… Expand

   • 0 of 4 users found this helpful
4. DRitz

   Apr 12, 2010

   3

   The game itself would not have been that bad if it were a new IP or an offshoot of the C&C Brand (Like a multi-player only side-game) but C&C The game itself would not have been that bad if it were a new IP or an offshoot of the C&C Brand (Like a multi-player only side-game) but C&C 4 was supposed to be the grand fanale of the traditional RTS, not some knock off. They should have kept the original formula and polished every speck of dust off of it. Personally I always like the C&C format of RTS, so I was serverly disappointed when I realized that the C&C franchise died with a whimper.… Expand

   • 1 of 1 users found this helpful
5. AndrewH.

   Mar 23, 2010

   1

   It is astounding that a sequel can have worse graphics, worse animation, worse visual interface and worse gameplay mechanic. Tiberian It is astounding that a sequel can have worse graphics, worse animation, worse visual interface and worse gameplay mechanic. Tiberian Twilight feels like and looks like a game made 3 years before Tiberium Wars. The new gameplay mechanic becomes increasingly tedious and unsatisfying, it just screams "dumbed down". Also I don't understand the awful visual baggage of green outlying of selected units, it makes the entire game even look uglier. Tiberian Twilight fails at the basic level of lacking high production values, and it tops it of with failed gameplay mechanic. A truly bizarre sequel.… Expand

   • 3 of 4 users found this helpful
6. Mefisto_

   Aug 23, 2015

   0

   Brilliant story of Tiberium Wars has been ruined. Gameplay is nothing like it was before, it is complete cr@p in fact. Online only mode isBrilliant story of Tiberium Wars has been ruined. Gameplay is nothing like it was before, it is complete cr@p in fact. Online only mode is also an annoying issue. I was hoping for great story continuation and epic/reasonable ending, but there was nothing like that. Super disappointing game for C&C Tiberium Wars fans, don't even bother watching youtube walkthroughs. I don't understand how EA have messed up so bad, although I should not be surprised about that.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
7. MikeM

   Mar 17, 2010

   0

   This game is NOT command and conquer. When westwood created the original back in 1995, they revolutionised RTS. They layed the base core of This game is NOT command and conquer. When westwood created the original back in 1995, they revolutionised RTS. They layed the base core of what all RTS games needed. Tiberiun sun expanded on this, and EA again expanded further, whislt also angering its community with shoddy balancing and too many changes of what was considered the norm. Having to seemingly not listen to the community, despite saying they have, they then release Kanes Wrath, which was essentially, what C&C should have been in terms of gameplay. Having once again displeased the community again with lack of patches and securom causing ALOT of system formats due to major issues with it, they now release C&C 4, which is nothing like the previous games. Just because the game references tiberium and uses it in a majorly poor way, has Kane, and has old units (that look totally different), does not make a game deserve the Command and Conquer title. This game should have been scrapped at the start and make how the people wanted it. EA, a company so narrow minded it seems, that they only care about the money, not what the people actually want. I do feel sorry for Joe Kucan who is basically the star of the whole series being sent out in such a poor, poor way.… Expand

   • 3 of 4 users found this helpful
8. Lizard

   Mar 18, 2010

   0

   well done EA, you've just successfully wrecked the most famous RTS franchise in PC gaming history. Moronic gameplay (that has nothing in well done EA, you've just successfully wrecked the most famous RTS franchise in PC gaming history. Moronic gameplay (that has nothing in common with the rest of the series) stolen from various other currently popular games coupled with a ridiculous DRM system that demands players always be online even when playing singleplayer are two huge, enormous, unforgiveable mistakes, they couldn't have done a better job of destroying this game if they'd actually tried. EA could get better results if they hired monkeys, C&C4 is an utter disgrace and when they pull the servers down after about 6 months all those poor souls who payed out good money for this rubbish won't be able to play it even if they wanted to.… Expand

   • 6 of 8 users found this helpful

See all 163 User Reviews