Runtime errors can be divided into low-level errors that involve violating constraints, such as:
Logical errors can lead to low-level errors if they are not detected. Often, it is better to detect them (to provide better feedback).
Errors can arise due to:
Note that recovery is often not possible at the point of the error (because the error may occur inside some utility method that doesn't know anything about the overall program or what error recovery should involve). Therefore, it is desirable to "pass the error up" to a level that can deal with it.
There are several possible ways to handle errors:
ret = g(x); if (ret == ERROR_CODE) { ... } else f(ret);instead of just:
f(g(x));
Idea:
Exceptions can be built-in (actually, defined in one of Java's standard libraries) or user-defined. Here are some examples of built-in exceptions with links to their documentation:
Catch exceptions using try blocks:
try { // statements that might cause exceptions // possibly including method calls } catch ( exception-1 id-1 ) { // statements to handle this exception } catch ( exception-2 id-2 ) { // statements to handle this exception . . . } finally { // statements to execute every time this try block executes }
Notes:
public static void main(String[] args) { InputStream istream; File inputFile; try { inputFile = new File(args[0]); istream = new InputStream(inputFile); // may throw FileNotFoundException } catch (FileNotFoundException ex) { System.out.println("file " + args[0] + " not found"); } }
Notes:
java.io.FilenotFoundException: foo at java.io.FileInputStream ... at ... at Test.main ...would be printed. (Actually, if there were no try/catch for the FileNotFoundException, the program wouldn't compile because it fails to list that exception as one that might be thrown. We'll come back to that issue later...)
Only uncaught checked exceptions need to be listed in a method's
throws clause. Unchecked exceptions can be caught in a try block, but if
not, they need not be listed in the method's throws clause.
Consider the following program (assume that comments are replaced
with actual code that works as specified):
Question 1:
Assume that method f might throw checked exceptions Ex1, Ex2, or Ex3.
Complete method g, outlined below, so that:
Question 2:
Consider the following method.
A. f(0, X, "hi");
Part B.
Checked and Unchecked Exceptions
Every exception is either a checked exception or an unchecked
exception.
If a method includes code that could cause a checked exception to be
thrown, then:
So in general, you must always include some code that acknowledges the
possibility of a checked exception being thrown.
If you don't, you will get an error when you try to compile your code.
+--------+
| Object |
+--------+
|
|
+-----------+
| Throwable |
+-----------+
/ \
/ \
+-------+ +-----------+
| Error | | Exception |
+-------+ +-----------+
/ | \ / | \
\________/ \______/ \
+------------------+
unchecked checked | RuntimeException |
+------------------+
/ | | \
\_________________/
unchecked
Choices when calling a method that may throw an exception
As mentioned above, if your code might cause a checked exception to be
thrown; i.e.,:
then your method must include a throws clause listing all such
exceptions. For example:
public static void main(String[] args) throws FileNotFoundException, EOFException
{ // an uncaught FileNotFoundException or EOFException may be thrown here }
public class TestExceptions {
static void e() {
// might cause any of the following unchecked exceptions to be thrown:
// Ex1, Ex2, Ex3, Ex4
}
static void d() {
try {
e();
} catch (Ex1 ex) {
System.out.println("d caught Ex1");
}
}
static void c() {
try {
d();
} catch (Ex2 ex) {
System.out.println("c caught Ex2");
// now cause exception Ex1 to be thrown
}
}
static void b() {
try {
c();
} catch (Ex1 ex) {
System.out.println("b caught Ex1");
} catch (Ex3 ex) {
System.out.println("b caught Ex3");
}
}
static void a() {
try {
b();
} catch (Ex4 ex) {
System.out.println("a caught Ex4");
// now cause exception Ex1 to be thrown
} catch (Ex1 ex) {
System.out.println("a caught Ex1");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
a();
}
}
Assume that this program is run four times.
The first time, method e throws exception Ex1,
the second time, it throws exception Ex2, etc.
For each of the four runs, say what is printed, and whether any
uncaught exception is thrown.
How to Define and Throw Exceptions
public class EmptyStackException extends Exception { }
There is no need to provide any methods or fields;
the class can have an empty body as shown above.
Note: New exceptions must be subclasses of Throwable; as
discussed above, they are usually subclasses of Exception (so that
they are checked).
public class Stack {
Note:
...
}
public Object pop() throws EmptyStackException {
if (empty()) throw new EmptyStackException();
}
...
static void g() throws ... {
try {
f();
} catch ( ... ) {
...
} ...
}
static void f(int k, int[] A, String S) {
int j = 1 / k;
int len = A.length + 1;
char c;
try {
c = S.charAt(0);
if (k == 10) j = A[3];
} catch (ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException ex) {
System.out.println("array error");
throw new InternalError();
} catch (ArithmeticException ex) {
System.out.println("arithmetic error");
} catch (NullPointerException ex) {
System.out.println("null ptr");
} finally {
System.out.println("in finally clause");
}
System.out.println("after try block");
}
Part A.
Assume that variable X is an array of int that has been initialized
to be of length 3.
For each of the following calls to method f, say what (if anything) is
printed by f, and what, if any, uncaught exceptions are thrown by f.
B. f(10, X, "");
C. f(10, X, "bye");
D. f(10, X, null);
Why doesn't f need to have a throws clause that lists the uncaught
exceptions that it might throw?
try {
// statements (including method calls) that might cause an exception
} catch ( exception-1 id1 ) {
// code to handle the first kind of exception
} catch ( exception-2 id2 ) {
// code to handle the second kind of exception
} ...
} finally {
// code that will execute whenever this try block does
}