Final demo/discussion Slots
Here are a few issues worth remembering:
- You will have to submit your code by May 5 (Wednesday) midnight. During the
demo, you will copy this submitted code back to your demo directory, compile
it and then run it for the demo.
- It is important both partners be present for the demo.
- You have 30 minutes for the demo/discussion. So please plan accordingly.
-
The goal will be to spend about 15-20 minutes doing the demo, and the remaining
10-15 minutes question/answer session.
- You may find it convenient to define scenarios, to demonstrate that
different parts of your project is working. Most of the grade will be based on
what you can demonstrate. For example in the e-CHIMP project, you may want to prepare a demo for
a 1-server system, a 3-server system, and a 10-server system. In the 10-server
system you may want to demonstrate that routing works! If its useful, draw
the topology on which you plan to demonstrate your system on a separate piece
of paper and bring it with you.
Prior to the demo, we will give you our suggested toplogies on which we
will run the interactive demos. Try them out and have them ready.
If the entire project does not work, plan out demo scenarios that indicate
parts of the system works.
- You may find it convenient to prepare some quick startup scripts to demonstrate
how different parts of the project is working.
- For the research projects, I would also like to see demos of the system
that you have implemented / evaluated (depending on what our pre-discussed
objectives were). Additionally each student doing a research project will need
to submit a research report. The report should contain the following: what
the problem you had started out with, adjustments made to the problems (if any)
due to various reasons, and why, what you accomplished, i.e., what you implemented,
what your observations are about the system, what are the logical next steps
to explore in this process and how you might go about doing it.
The writeup will be important especially in the case where you do not have a
well-defined demo during the meeting. Focus more on the details on what
you achieved, what you could not achieve (and explain why not), and what the
next steps are (and how you can go about doing them).
Please email me your choice of time slots from below. Preferrably three
alternative slots in order of preference.
May 6: Thursday
2.30-3.00: Matt Delisle
3.00-3.30: Matthew Farrellee
3.30-4.00: Eric Olson, Chris Mielke
4.00-4.30: Kedar Mane
4.30-5.00: Matt Doermann
5.00-5.30: Daniel Nicolalde, Lise-Marie Motet
May 7: Friday
10.00-10.30: Vladimir Brik, Jessse Stroik
10.30-11.00: Swaroop Sayeram, Amar Padmanabhan
11.00-11.30: Eric Rozner, Jayson Gant
11.30-12.00: Kuo-Hsing Tang, Roshan Soni
1.30-2.00: Kevin Strousse, Brian Devetter
2.00-2.30: Todd Miller
2.30-3.00: Nick Didier, Michael Grossheim
3.00-3.30: Luis Recalde
3.30-4.00: Keith Framnes, Derek Gjertson
4.00-4.30: Pablo Celada
4.30-5.00: Tyler Gray, Dan Weichsel
5.00-5.30: Michael Blodgett, Josh Mateffy