Re: Thie^.n A'c va` ca'c Tam gia'c

[Hong Lam Vu <vuh000@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de>]

Hi ba'c Vie^.t,

>  I would agree at least at the phylo level. Yes, I know something
> that " Ra ddu+o+`ng ga(.p Pha^.t gie^'t Pha^.t....."
>  As I said the true value depends on space-time ( and the context).
> 
 When you have more, contending value systems, how can you solve this
problem. Or, in other words, how can you point out the true value which
depends on time, space and context. I am interested rather on technologies
of this process of discovery than the existence of the true value itself.

> About the triangles, you draw very bad parallelism. The opposite of Thien 
> = Ac . So the translation should be as follows: If Thie^.n or A'c (up to you)
> as rectangular triangles the opposite ( A'c or Thie^.n) should be the 
> triangles that are not rectangular.
>   No relevant superset here. But anyway, I wanted to say that you can 
> talk of one thing and others can think of other things.

Em cu+' kho^ng que^n ddu+o+.c ca^u dda^`u tie^n trong Kinh Tha'nh:
	"In the beginning was the word"
co' le~ chi'nh "lo+`i no'i" la` ca'i "to^.i to^? to^ng" cu?a loa`i
nguo+`i.

>   Look at the following:
>   "Thu+.c te^' bao tru`m va(n ho.c "
>   " Va(n ho.c phong phu' ho+n thu+.c te^'"
>  This pair of statement has costed lives of people. Non sense, huh.
> 
Vi' du. ra^'t hay. Ba'c no'i the^' na`y thi` em hie^?u ngay, chu+' no'i
ca'i tam gia'c thi` ddu'ng la` em bi. hie^?u nha^`m.

 Cheers
La^m