Re: Tin VN: Du+. Tha?o Su+?a DDo^?i Ho.c Phi'

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>]

Hi Anh Ca, Anh Toan and democratic socialists,
   I would agree with you about " mo'c tu'i" the rich men. That is a dream
of almost all good hearted men like you. I will say something from another
angle and may be a litle bit far from what you are discussing.
   However, in practice, it is not always possible to do that. If I have 
money and powerful enough, I can do a lot of good things, otherwise I can 
only show my good intentions.
   Sometimes, "mo'c tu'i ngu+o+`i gia`u" should have a limit. It is the rich
people who bring business and generate jobs for poor men. In France for 
instance the high tax on rich people leads to high rate of unemployment.
   So as any truths in the world, "mo'c tu'i ngu+o+`i gia`u" is a good
thing only after the economy stabilized. By now, we need a lot of rich men
in VN, who earn the money in a honest way. The policy should concentrate
on making the honest ways incentive for those people.
   Capitalist economies ( good or bad is not relevant here) always start
with capital concentration and there used to be few things that people 
always hesitate to pay the cost for. 
   When deciding to introduce the economic reform, Hungary had to " sacrify
the midle and poor class for few years".
   So Japan could not be an exception. Anh Ca was lucky to enjoy good 
things without paying the painful cost of it.
  Cheers
  Aiviet


  

On Wed, 12 Mar 1997, Vu Thanh Ca wrote:

> Cha`o ba'c Toa`n va` ba'c La^n,
> 
> Tru+o+'c he^'t. to^i xin ca'm o+n ba'c La^n dda~ tha?o lua^.n ra^'t co'
> ly' co' ti`nh ve^` va^'n dde^` na`y. Cu~ng ca^`n pha?i co' ca'ch mo'c
> tu'i ngu+o+`i gia`u dde^? ddu+a la.i cho xa~ ho^.i mo^.t chu't. O+?
> nu+o+'c Nha^.t ho. la`m ca'i na`y hay ra phe^'t. Ho^`i to^i mo+'i sang
> Nha^.t, to^i go.i Nha^.t la` nu+o+'c "Tu+ ba?n chu? nghi~a", bi. ngay
> ma^'y o^ng gia'o su+?a : "Co' le~ go.i Nha^.t la` nu+o+'c da^n chu?
> xa~ ho^.i chu? nghi~a thi` ddu'ng ho+n". O+? Nha^.t ba'c ddu+`ng 
> co' co^'. Lu+o+ng ca`ng cao, thue^' ca`ng cao. Nhie^`u o^ng pha?i 
> ddo'ng thue^' dde^'n 55% tie^`n lu+o+ng, nghe ma` xo't ca? ruo^.t.
> Ma` thu+`a ke^' ta`i sa?n cu~ng ddu+o+.c go.i la` thu nha^.p dda^'y 
> nhe'. "DDo+`i cua cua ngoa'y, ddo+`i ca'y ca'y dda`o", cu+' la` pha?i
> la`m la.i tu+` dda^`u.
> 
> Y' chu+`ng khi to^i ve^` thi` cu~ng bi. mo'c tu'i dda^'y :))). Nhu+ng la`
> quy lua^.t ha`ng tie^`n ma` :-).
> 
> O+? trong nu+o+'c co' kho^'i vie^.c la`m dda^'y ca'c ba'c a.. Ma^'y 
> na(m tru+o+'c, to^i co' tham gia ca'i du+. a'n quy hoa.ch to^?ng the^?
> ca'c ca?ng mie^`n Trung Vie^.t nam vo+'i mo^.t co^ng ty tu+ va^'n cu?a 
> ADB, To^i chi? tham gia co' 20 nga`y vo+'i tu+ ca'ch kha'ch mo+`i 
> tho^i vi` vie^.c cu?a to^i la` o+? tru+o+`ng, kho^ng pha?i ADB. ChI?
> co' 3 ngu+o+`i, la`m trong vo`ng na(m tha'ng va` ma^'y ngu+o+`i nu+~a
> mo+`i nga('n ha.n tu+` My~, Nha^.t sang ma` xong mo^.t du+. a'n tri. gia'
> 1.2 trie^.u USD. O^ng gia'm ddo^'c co^ng ty tu+ va^'n co' ho?i to^i
> ve^` ma^'y du+. a'n kha'c, to^i ho?i o^ng sao kho^ng mo+`i ngu+o+`i
> trong nu+o+'c la`mcu`ng, o^ng tra? lo+`i la` muo^'n la('m nhu+ng 
> kho^ng ti`m ddu+o+.c.
> 
> Tuy nhie^n to^i cu~ng pha?i no'i ra(`ng to^i dda~ tu+`ng go.i ba'c
> Toa`n la` tri ky?. To^i tha`nh thu+.c ma` nghi~ the^' dda^'y. Cha(?ng
> bie^'t la` ba'c Toa`n co' cha^'p nha^.n kho^ng. Thu+.c ra thi` y' kie^'n
> cu?a hai ba'c dde^`u la` hay va` ddu'ng ca?, va` chi? la` dde^? bo^? 
> sung cho nhau.
> 
> Xa~ ho^.i ta ddang pha't trie^?n, ca'c khuye^'t ta^.t cu?a no' thi` no'i
> ca? nga`y cu~ng kho^ng he^'t. Cu~ng ca^`n pha?i no'i dde^? ca?nh 
> ti?nh. Nhu+ng ca'i ca^`n ho+n he^'t la` tu+. mi`nh pha?i la`m gi`. Hy
> vo.ng ca'c ba'c se~ ti`m ddu+o+.c  lo+`i gia?i dda'p cho mi`nh. 
> 
> To^i xin phe'p ba'c Toa`n forward ca'i y' kie^'n cu?a ba'c le^n VKS dde^?
> mo.i ngu+o+`i cu`ng ddo.c nhe'.
> 
> Ca.
> 
> 
>