Small Talks about UNIFICATIONS

[Sonnet Nguyen <Sonnet.Nguyen@fuw.edu.pl>]

Hi all,
Usually unification's theory is understood as a theory in Physics which
is able to describing all interactions in nature. ( As I we know today
in our universe are four fundamental kinds of interactions: strong, weak,
electromagnetic and gravitational.  Many things have been done in this
direction and we almost have the strong-electro-weak theory. )      
In fact, unification and decomposition are two tendentions which are
observed everywhere.  The collapse of former Soviet Union (and maybe
Chine) and of many many imperiums in world's history.  The unification of
european countries to unitied state of Europe, world's trading treaty,
etc... 
Let me turn back to Science and unification's tendention in Science.
For example in mathematics, the fist step to unification was done by
Decard in 17-th century.  Decard unified "geometry" and "algebra" and
created sth called by "analitical geometry".  Riemann did a great deal to
unify "analysis" and "geometry".   Indeed, Riemann also did many things 
to unify "analysis" and "number theory".  Remind here, for example:
Hadamard's Prime Number Theorem and still unsolved Riemann Hipothesis. 
(i.e. about zeros of Zeta function.  The solution of Riemann hipothesis
implies very very precise information about the distribution of prime
numbers.)
Prof. Hoang Phuong just want to unify VN-se medicine with mathematics.
S. Hawking want to unify EVERYTHING (remind that everything is a bad
conception!) and  Mr. SN want to decompose EVERYTHING.
And what about Party?
Hmm, Let me think ....

enjoys,
SN