[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: PHO'? (Pha^`n 4 - Tie^'p theo) -Reply



Pho+ Thi`n  of Ddinh Tien Hoang is the one at Hoan Kiem Lake. You have a 
good taste.
Aiviet

On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Le Phu Binh wrote:

> 
> So how about Pho Thi`n nearby Hoan Kiem lake? I tried both there and Pho
> Thin at the corner of Lo` -Du'c - Le^ Va(n Hu*u and seems the one at Hoan
> Kiem lake is better, another thing to prove is Pho Thin at HK lake has
> have more customer than the one in LoDuc.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> PBi`nh
> 
> On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Aiviet Nguyen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, two protocols cannot talk much. However, the real Pho+? Thi`n is not 
> > in LoDuc. That is the fake Thi`n.
> >   And the fake things are usually not so good.(There can be exceptions 
> > though). It is commonly accepted that the best Pho+? in 
> > Hanoi was the real Pho+? Thi`n that located on Ddinh Tie^n Hoa`ng Street.
> >   Professor Cooperman, an american also agreed with that. 
> > I also heard that american-vietnamese in Cali believed that the Cali Pho+ 
> > is the best. 
> >   Cheers
> >   Aiviet
> > ================
> > 
> >   Ddi vo+'i ba.n hay ddi vo+'i ngu+o+`i ye^u. Vo+'i nguo+`i ye^u thi` 
> > pha?i hai na(m ro~ mu+o+`i.
> > 
> >   Ddo'i bu.ng nho+' Ba'c si~ Thi`n. Nu+?a dde^n gia^.t mi`nh nho+' ba'c 
> > dde.p giai. Dde.p giai nhu+ la` lai Pha'p.
> >  
> >            Quotes from the real Mr.Thi`n.
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Huy Quang Nguyen (Global Trends) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello anh AiViet
> > > 
> > > Your assumptions could not be applied to the everyone. On my own
> > > thought, the Pho+?'s tastes depends much on people who have Pho+?. I
> > > tried Pho+? in the Seattle's China town, San Jose... and believe myself
> > > that Pho+? Thi`n Ha` No^.i (must be the one in LoDuc) is the best one
> > > all around the world. But my Viet-American friend also tried this in
> > > Hanoi and he betted that the Pho+? in Seatte was better. However, you
> > > eat your Pho+? and I eat mine.
> > > 
> > > Quang Huy
> > > 
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: 	Aiviet Nguyen
> > > > Reply To: 	vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu
> > > > Sent: 	Tuesday, April 08, 1997 11:08 PM
> > > > To: 	Multiple recipients of list
> > > > Subject: 	Re: PHO'? (Pha^`n 4 - Tie^'p theo) -Reply
> > > > 
> > > >  Hi Anh TA Tuan,
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for Pho+?. In the last year, I had Pho+? in Hanoi, but it was
> > > > not 
> > > > so good as I thought. 
> > > >  In fact, it is just a nostalgia about those the days. The atmosphere,
> > > > 
> > > > the memory of old days are more important than Pho+? itself.
> > > >  Now I can bet that the Pho+?, my "Ba` Chi. ho." cooks is the best in
> > > > the 
> > > > world ( Seriously !!).
> > > >   
> > > >   It is a fact that we are loosing all habits. Attempts to keep them
> > > > are 
> > > > ridiculous. A lot of handy craft shops stopped their productions. Su+ 
> > > > Ha?i du+o+ng cannot compete with low quality Chinese one.
> > > > 
> > > >   In 1986, one of my friend invited me to watch " Mu'a bo^ng". He
> > > > said, 
> > > > we are the last people who can enjoy this culture. Now I regret that I
> > > > 
> > > > did not go because I had a meeting in my institute.
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Aiviet
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
>