RE: Ba'o VN: Sinh vie^n no'i gi` ve^` Dda.i ho.c Dda.i cu+o+ng

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>]

Hi Anh Huy,
My reason is that after they invested few years they should be able to 
utilize the knowledge. The students from the villages spent all their
saving for a life to try and failed. It would have been better for them 
to start at technical training institutes, where they can learn a 
profession for their future.

  To split a University into two parts is the craziest idea in the world.
The juniors should have contact with seniors in the same environment to 
develope their ability. We cannot produce good profeesionals by close 
them into a class taught by Nobel laureates. Interaction between people 
and disciplines is the sense of Universities. Otherwise, it means only a 
good library with good facilities.

Cheers
Aiviet  

On Wed, 9 Apr 1997, Huy Quang Nguyen (Global Trends) wrote:

> Then what are your reasons? Absurd is being very necessary because it
> give our students a very base knowledges before entering the
> professional fields. Certainly, part of them could not pass the final
> exam but that's OK. They will do their job much better than ones who
> just graduated from high-school. And the last but not least, absurd
> encourages students to study. Universities are not places for students
> to play around which is the situation of 80s.
> 
> Quang Huy
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	Aiviet Nguyen
> > Reply To: 	vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu
> > Sent: 	Wednesday, April 09, 1997 9:47 PM
> > To: 	Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject: 	Re: Ba'o VN: Sinh vie^n no'i gi` ve^` Dda.i ho.c Dda.i
> > cu+o+ng
> > 
> > 
> > Dda,i ho.c dda.i Cu+o+ng = Absurd.
> > I have been against it from the very beginning.
> > 
> > Aiviet
> > 
>