RE: PHO'? (Pha^`n 4 - Tie^'p theo) -Reply

[Le Phu Binh <lpbinh@taygate.cl.au.ac.th>]

Hi ba'c Ha?i,

	Ba'nh khu'c la` mo^.t cu.c -da^.u xanh, ngoa`i bo.c mo^.t lo*'p
co*m ne^'t, thu*o*`ng -du*o*.c du`ng trong bu*~a a(n sa'ng....to^i la^u
ro^`i kho^ng a(n ba'nh khu'c ne^n chi? nho*' mang ma'ng nhu* the^'...

Cheers

PBi`nh

On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, Hai-Tri Le wrote:

> Hi, ba'c La^m
> 
> Ba'c ui, "ba'nh khu'c" la` ba'nh gi` dza^.y ?
> 
> Xin ddu+`ng tra'ch tui nhe' ca'c ba'c. Tui sinh ra o+? Hue^', tuo^?i
> tho+ so^'ng o+? Nha Trang, lo+'n le^n 1 ti. o+? SG, cho ne^n nhie^`u khi
> ca'c ba'c vie^'t ve^` nhu+~ng "dda(.c sa?n" ngoa`i Ba('c tui mu` ti.t,
> cha(?ng ha.n nhu+ ca'i da^.m cu?a ba'c AiViet. Bo+?i va^.y la^u la^u
> ddo.c tha^'y ca'i gi` kho^ng hie^?u thi` tui ho?i. Ca'c ba'c ddu+`ng
> quo+? nhe'.
> 
> Ti`nh tha^n,
> HL
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Hong Lam Vu [SMTP:vuh000@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de]
> > Sent:	Thursday, April 10, 1997 9:11 AM
> > To:	Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject:	Re: PHO'? (Pha^`n 4 - Tie^'p theo)  -Reply
> > 
> > Hi ba'c Frank,
> > 
> > Tui xa VNSA ma^'y nga`y, k0 bie^'t co' ai dda~ no'i chuye^.n tie^'ng
> > ra ni
> > chu+a, cu+' xin go'p ma^'y ca^u. Ba?o tie^'ng ra dda~ bie^'n ma^'t o+?
> > ngoa`i Ba('c sau 54 la` ta^`m ba^.y, vi` tui sinh ra sau 54 ma` va^~n
> > co`n
> > nghe lanh la?nh tie^'ng rao ca'c lao.i so+'m to^'i o+? HN. Buo^?i
> > to^'i,
> > khoa?ng 10-11 gio+` la` tie^'ng rao "Ai khu'c no'ng o+" cu?a nh~ ng`
> > ba'n
> > ba'nh khu'c. Ho^`i "truo+'c ddo^?i mo+'i", khoa?ng 11 gio+` la`
> > dduo+`ng
> > pho^' HN dda~ va('ng teo ne^n tie^'ng rao vang ra1^'t xa. Ho^`i ng`
> > Hoa
> > co`n chu+a ve^` nuo+'c, cu~ng buo^?i to^'i co`n co' tie^'ng rao cu?a
> > ca'c
> > o^ng "tha`y" ta^?m qua^'t, tie^'c ra(`ng dda~ la^u ne^n tui que^n
> > ma^'t
> > ho. rao the^' NA`o. Sa'ng so+'m thi` co' tie^'ng rao cu?a ba` xo^i
> > xe'o,
> > xo^i vu+`ng, ca'c loa.i xo^i. Ban nga`y thi` "Lo^ng ga` lo^ng vi.t
> > de'p
> > nhu+.a ho?ng ba`..a'n dde^".
> > 
> > Tha^n,
> > La^m.
> > 
>