[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
George Orwell (was To Anh Cong Bang)
Hi anh AnHai,
Thank you for all of your recent messages explaining and begging the
understanding of folks following the thread.
An explanation is just an explanation!
I am looking forward to reading your future more-careful postings.
Kind regards,
Cong Bang.
PS. - I would like to take this occasion to have a question for you. I
have asked anh Die^?mQuynh to post "Animal Farm" by G. Orwell. Somehow
like "science fiction", the author created in his novel the "Animalism".
The decade-lasting discussions following the birth of this novel
focussed on the "Animalism" versus Capitalism, Socialism.....Can I post one of
these discussions, entitled "Orwell & Marx: Animalism vs. Marxism" ? or
we just simply ignore something only because it refers to the Marxism?
- For those interested in this novel, here is something about
the author and his masterpiece.
-
George Orwell - The Voice Of The 20th Century
The tone of the 20th century was set long before the first day of its
first year. The 19th century had begun with a new and profoundly
different presence on the world stage. Born at the close of the 18th century,
the United States, with its huge expanse, vast resources and independent
spirit, would lead the western world into the intense industrialization
of the 19th century. Thus, the 20th century dawned on a world which had
become both master and slave of the great mechanized society. And no
part of 20th century society would seize the power created by this massive
industrialization more than its politicians and warriors.
Terror, in both war and peace, had been with mankind since the first
man realized that a stick or a stone could get you your way not only with
a woolly bison, but with your fellow cavedwellers as well. But, prior
to the 20th century, wars were fought by armies which met on a field of
battle far separated from civilian life. During the 20th century,
however, from the Somme to Guernica to Coventry to Dresden to Hiroshima, mass
terror against civilians during wartime had become an instrumentality of
national will. (Even during the relatively peaceful last half of the
20th century, the threat of mass terror, that is, psychological terror -
the mad policy of Mutually Assured Destruction - was employed by the
American and Soviet superpowers.) And politicians and government leaders, who
had so willingly employed these new and profoundly inhuman tools of war
soon realized the effectiveness of terror as an instrument of domestic
social policy, also. Within the 20th century, the campaigns of terror by
the Russian Czar and the Soviet and Nazis governments against their own
citizens and, to the same end, the McCarthite campaign of the United
States government against the American people are examples of the use of
such terror. Generally seen as a "socialist" policy, such domestic terror
is, in fact, a force of "de-socialization", fragmenting the society and
alienating individuals from each other and from the group as well.
Orwell's writings and, in fact, his life itself, were concerned with
the process and mechanism, and, more importantly, with the consequences
of this alienation. This itself is not wholly different from other
writers. What separates Orwell and his writings from the others, however, is
his view of the connection between the form of social interaction and the
individual's psychological/emotional, and ultimately his spiritual well
being.
The Man
George Orwell was the pen name of an Englishman named Eric Arthur
Blair. At the time of his birth in India in 1903, Orwell's father served as
a civil servant in that part of the then vast English empire. Shortly
after he was born, Orwell's mother brought he and his sister to England,
where he grew up and went to school. He died of a neglected lung ailment
in 1950, having lived only forty-seven years, during which he wrote nine
books and a large number of essays.
The Philosophy
Although he saw himself as merely a writer, at best, a political
writer, George Orwell was, in the end, far more. Culminating in his last two
novels, Animal Farm and finally Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell's entire
body of work portrays a complete philosophy, encompassing the political,
social and, on an even deeper level, the psychological interplay between
the individual and the group. (The idea of the group, as opposed to the
larger and more generic "society", is compelling in Orwell's work,
because of its more pervasive and immediate importance to the individual's
well being.) While on a less fundamental level, Orwell's writing may be
seen as merely concerned with the struggle between the individual and the
group, Orwell's deeper view is a more integrated one. It is, at base,
that the individual's relationship to the particular group in which he
lives and functions, and, in turn, the group's attitude toward the
individual will ultimately determine the individual's autonomy, that is, his
freedom to be himself; to be. As his view of the writings of Charles
Dickens was simply that "If men would behave decently, the world would be
decent", Orwell implores that our most basic individual responsibility is
not merely to stand against the group, but, as individuals within the
group, to act in such a way as to make the group a viable place in which the
individual can thrive. As Winston Smith so indelibly and painfully
illustrates, given our psychological constraints, to ask anything more of
the individual is to imagine something that cannot be. Thus, Orwell
believes and Nineteen Eighty-Four demonstrates that only when we create groups
in which the individual is valued will each individual be safe and able
to survive. And, only then, will the individual be capable of
supporting the enlightened values of the group itself.
Copyright © Norman Ershler 1996