[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DDa.i, tie^?u thu+`a
Hi ba'c Diem Quynh et al
> >Thi'ch Ca khi co`n so^'ng chi? gia?ng dda.o kho^ng va` kho^ng ai ghi
> >che'p la.i tha`nh Kinh. Tha^.m chi' Nga`i co`n no'i trong ho+n 40 na(m
> >thuye^'t Pha'p ta chu+a no'i 1 lo+`i na`o\. Ca^u no'i na`y cu~ng kho^ng
> >ai da'm qua? quye^'t ddu+o+.c tho^'t ra tu+` mie^.ng Pha^.t\.
>
> :::::-) DDo^`ng y' vo*'i ba'c ddie^`u na`y, theo to^i hie^?u tu theo
To^i cu~ng ddo^\ng y' la\ tu kie^?u gi\ cu~ng ddu+o+.c (mie^~n sao tha\nh
Pha^.t)
Nhu+ng ma\ chuye^.n Pha^.t to^? no'i "ta chu+a no'i lo+\i na\o" thi\ to^i
ho+i ba(n khoa(n, sao Nga`i la.i co' the^? "lu+o+~i kho^ng xu+o+ng" dde^'n
the^'. Cha? tra'ch
ha^.u the^' ve^\ sau mo^~i ngu+o+\i hie^?u mo^.t kie^?u
Cheers, Zung