[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: to Admins, Re: MNKP




To^i cu~ng nghi~ ca'c ba'c ne^n ngu+`ng trao ddo^?i ve^` ca'i 
"Me`o tra('ng me`o dden" na`y ddi la` vu+`a ru`i.

Ca'i vu. cu.c bo^. ddi.a phu+o+ng chu? nghi~a "Mie^`n Ba('c mie^`n Nam" 
to^i dda~ tha^'y qua' nhie^`u ro^`i va` cha(?ng co' gi` to^'t dde.p ca?

Tra?i qua nhie^`u mo^i tru+o+`ng ro^`i (tu+` mie^`n Ba('c to+'i mie^`n Nam
qua Nga ro^`i gio+` o+? Pha'p) ddie^`u chung nha^'t la` su+. chia re~ va`
ganh ghe't ky` thi. dde^'n tu+` ca? hai phi'a.
                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No'i tha(?ng ra tui co' lu+o+'t so+ ca'i ba`i MNKP tha^'y
no' hoa`n toa`n kho^ng co' gia' tri. hay no'i nhe. nha`ng ho+n la`
kho^ng dda'ng dde^? chu'ng ta tranh lua^.n.

NTN.

> From: AnHai Doan <anhai@cs.washington.edu>

> Boy, oh boy, if this is the case then now I get myself into a mess. 
> First, I would like to apologize to anh Ian Bui and the author for this
> oversight and any problem that may result from this. Second, I would
> like to propose doing the followings to clean up this mess: 

> 1) Since now we have known that the author requests to be informed
> of any discussion on his paper, I would lke to ask you all to STOP
> DISCUSSING THIS PAPER. I will send this message as well as all vnsa 
> postings related to his paper to his e-mail address.

> 2) I will talk about this with the author, and offer him a chance
> to post whatever he wants to say concerning this topic and his paper 
> on vnsa.

> 3) The paper was posted with the intention of initiating discussions
> about the literature situation in Southern Vietnam. I think this is an
> interesting and useful topic. So even though we don't discuss the paper
> (actually there is not much left to discuss about the paper itself), I
> am really interested in reading more postings analyzing and discussing
> the literature situation in both Northern and Southern Vietnam. 

> Best regards, Hai.