Re: Nhi`n mo^.t phi'a.

[Tuan V Nguyen <t.nguyen@garvan.unsw.edu.au>]

Hi anh AiViet va` ca'c ba'c,

        To^i co`n nghe no'i la` trong su+? cu?a tu.i Ta`u (da.y o+? trung
ho.c), no' vie^'t la` VN va` DDa.i Ha`n la` dda^'t cu?a Ta`u nga`y xu+a! 

At 03:57 PM 6/11/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Hi folks,
>
>  To^i ddang ca'u la('m dda^y. To^? cha ca'i tha(`ng Ta`u la`m cu`ng.
>No' no'i la` na(m 79 li'nh Ta`u gie^'t dda`n ba` tre? con o+? La.ng So+n 
>la` ta.i vi` bo.n dda`n ba` Vie^.t Nam gie^'t li'nh Ta`u. Ly' lua^.n cu? 
>chuo^'i the^' ma` kho^ng dda^'m cho ho^.c ma'u ra thi` cu~ng tu+'c tha^.t.
>( So+. be^? no^`i co+m).

        Vi` tu.i Ta`u no^~i tie^'ng va` he`n va` he`n. Chi? gie^'t dda`n ba`
tre? con tho^i. 

        Hi`nh nhu+ qua ca'c tho+`i dda.i dda'nh dda' nhau, Ta`u chu+a
tha('ng ai ca? ma` chi? thua tho^i (co' ba'c na`o su+?a to^i kho^ng?). Bi.
Mo^ng Co^?, Nha^.t dda'nh to+i bo+`i, ro^`i to+'i tu.i A(ng Le^ la^'y luo^n
mo^.t ho`n dda?o ... a^'y the^' ma` no' kho^ng bie^'t nhu.c ma` co`n no'i
ba' vo+ ...


>   No' co`n no'i nhu+ ddinh ddo'ng co^.t la` dda^'t na`y dda?o kia cu?a Ta`u.

        Vi` no' mu` va` kho^ng chi.u ddo.c sa'ch. ne^'u to^i la` anh thi`
to^i se~ chu+?i tha(?ng la` "ddo^` ngu" = grossly intellectual dishonesty.

>Ro^`i no' no'i na(m 79 qua^n Ta`u dda'nh dde^'n sa't Ha` no^.i mo+'i ru't.
>To^i vu+`a chu+?i ha('n xong. Ma` ly' lua^.n kie^?u na`y ha.i tha^`n kinh 
>qua'. Ha('n ddu+o+.c ho.c va` nghe nhu+ va^.y ma`.

        Chu+' kho^ng pha?i tu.i Ta`u bi. dda'nh ga^`n che^'t va` pha?i o^m
dda^`u ma'u cha.y ve^` Ta`u a`? "Da.y mo^.t ba`i ho.c" dda~ tha`nh "Ho.c
mo^.t ba`i ho.c" dda'ng ddo+`i. Ba'o chi' the^' gio+'i co' no'i ro~ ra`ng ra
ddo', ke^u ca'i tha(`ng Ta`u ddo' ti`m ma` ddo.c. To^? cha ma^'y tha(`ng Ta`u!

        My blood is boiling!

        Tua^'n