Re: Ba`i Review cu?a TS Nguyen Xuan Tuyen

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>]

 Hi Anh TienZung,

   What can guarantee that the Tuyen's paper is bad and the reviewer is 
right. If few reviewer refuse to review the paper will not be reviewed
at all. For an objective outsider, Hung or Tuyen are equal.
 
  Nothing tells Math Rev. that Tbilisi's journal is a bad one. We should 
live with conventions: 
  -It is for MathRev. to decide which Journal can be reviewed.
  - It is for referee to decide which paper to be published.
  - It is for reviewer to decide which paper they like to review.
  - Review is not a referee report.

I never published anything in Tbilisi. Don't know Tuyen and Hung personally.
Only my opinion and the practice in some expert community in the US. 
Ethically, I don't agree with such a review. It is like you admit some Ph.D.
student and fail him or even worse if you accept to write a 
recommendation letter for somebody ( to his request) and say bad things.

Nothing prohibits you to do that, but that is not ethically correct.

Cheers
Aiviet