Re: Tie^'n sy~ danh du+.

[Le Phu Binh <lpbinh@taygate.cl.au.ac.th>]

Ehmmm...ca'ch -da^y ma^'y tua^`n o^ng su*' Thu.y si~ o*? BKK -du*o*.c
ca^'p ba(`ng danh du*. ve^` lua^.t o*? tru*o*`ng to^i -da^'y, ma` cha(~ng
pha?i ho.c gi` ca?, chi? co' co^ng ke^'t no^'i giu*~a tru*o*`ng to^i va`
mo^.t so^' tru*o*`ng nu*o*'c o^?ng. Co`n o^ng hie^.u tru*o*?ng tru*o*`ng
to^i chuye^'n vu*`a ro^`i -di cha^u a^u cu~ng -du*o*.c ca^'p mo^.t ca'i
ba(`ng Tie^'n si~, ma` cha('c cha('n la` cha(~ng co' pha?i ho.c ti' gi`
-da^u.

Cheers

Bi`nh

On Thu, 19 Jun 1997 tuan@hosoe.nuem.nagoya-u.ac.jp wrote:

> E he`m: vu+`a ro^`i co' ba'c na`o gia?i thi'ch ra(`ng anh na`o o+? Vie^.n Toa'n
> tu+` Italy sang Poland 1 tua^`n dda~ co' ba(`ng Tie^'n sy~ thi` ddo' la` ba(`ng
> Tie^'n sy~ DANH DU+. 
> Ba'c ddu`a vui vo+'i mo.i ngu+o+`i hay ba'c no'i nghie^m chi?nh dda^'y?
> Cheers,
> T.
>