Re: Ve^` vu. GS Tuye^'n

["Nguyen Tien Zung" <tienzung@darboux.math.univ-montp2.fr>]

Hi ba'c AiViet

----------
> De : Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>
>    To^i chi? xin tra? lo+`i ca'i cho^~ co' te^n to^i mo^.t chu't. Co`n 
> nhu+~ng ddie^?m kha'c cha(?ng co' di'nh da'ng. Tuy nhie^n to^i hy vo.ng 
> chi? la` y' kie^'n ca' nha^n cu?A anh Du~ng, cha(?ng co' hie^.u lu+.c 
> pha'p ly' gi`. Cha(?ng ha.n gia? thuye^'t o^ng Tuye^'n "co' the^? hu+~u
nghi." ma` 
> ddem co^ng lua^.n ra the^' na`y thi` che^'t cha o^ng Tuye^'n.

Ta^'t nhie^n ro^\i, to^i co' tham gia ho^.i ddo^\ng gia?i quye^'t vu. na\y
dda^u ma\ pha'p ly' vo+i' kho^ng pha'p ly', to^i chi? no' o+? die^~n dda\n
tho^i
ma\. Ne^'u to^i ma\ la\m o+? ho^.i ddo^\ng thi\ ta^'t nhie^n to^i se~
double-check,
triple-check mo.i thu+' nhu+ ba'c no'i, nho+\ ngu+o+\i o+? be^n Nga
photocopy
la.i ca'c ba\i ba'o va\ lua^.n a'n cu?a o^ Tuye^n (btw, it is what i
suggested in a previous
mail that the commission should do  immediately), 
co\n o+? die^~n dda\n thi\ la\m nhu+ the^'
co' to^'n qua' nhie^\u co^ng su+'c kho^ng? Chuye^.n o^ Tuyen "hu+~u nghi."
thi\
to^i no'i la\ "co' the^?" tho^i ma\, tu+'c la\ kho^ng loa.i tru+\ kha?
na(ng na\y. 
Ngay ne^'u to^i la\ thanh tra thi\ to^i cu~ng hoa\n toa\n co' quye^\n no'i
dda^y la\ mo^.t trong
ca'c cha? na(ng chu+'. Ne^'u to^i o+? commission thi\ to^i cu~ng tra ra ai
trong ho^.i
ddo^\ng cu?a o^ Tuye^n, ro^\i vie^'t thu go.i ddie^.n ho?i ho. ngay, ne^'yu
tha^'y ca^\n
thie^'t.
    
>   Cha('c pha?i thie^'u thi` gio+` la('m mo+'i co' the^? "know" about O^ng

> Tuye^'n's science qua ba`i bi`nh cu?a ngu+o+`i kha'c. Ne^'u to^i quan 
> ta^m tha.^t thi` to^i pha?i ddi ddo.c ba`9 i cu?a o^ng Tuye^'n dda~. 

I don't understand why I should read the nine papers of Mr. Tuyen. The
reviews
tell me it's unnecessary to read them (that's what reviews are about,
right?).
Again, if I were in the commission, I would check them.

>Ta.i  sao to^i la.i pha?i tin mo^.t ba`i kho^ng refereed ho+n mo^.t ba`i
dda~ 
> referred co+ chu+'. 

A^'y tui kho^ng no'i chuye^.n refereed hay kho^ng. Tui ba\n ve^\ ba\i
review, ma\
ba\i review ddo' ddu+o+.c o^ng Tuye^'n thu+a\ nha^.n la\ ddu'ng, va\ tui
du\ng
suy lua^.n logic cha(.t che~ tho^i.
 
>   Co`n to^i thi` cha(?ng thie^'t ddu'ng sai kho^ng pha?i vie^.c cu?a
to^i.
> Chi? co' bo.n Tbilisi mo+'i tu+o+'c ba(`ng cu?a o^ng Tuye^'n ddu+o+.c.

To^i co' ba\n gi\ chuye^.n tu+o+'c ba(\ng o^ Tuyen dda^u. Chuye^.n na\y la\
thu+'
ye^'u (tuy o^ ta va^~n co' the^? co' ba(\ng ma\ VN va^~n co' the^? kho^ng
co^ng
nha^.n). Ca'i ddie^?m quan tro.ng o+? dda^y la\ su+. trung thu+.c cu?a o^
Tuyen trong khoa ho.c co+ ma\.

>   To^i cha(?ng tha^'y ba` Hu+o+ng be^nh gi` o^ng Tuye^'n ca?.

Ba\ Hu+o+ng cu~ng nhu+ o^ Nam So+n gi\ ddo' no'i la\ ba\i review chi? ba\n
ve^\
khoa ho.c giu+~a ca'c nha\ chuye^n mo^n. To^i thi\ tha^'y ba\i review
kho^ng chi? ve^\
khoa ho.c ma\ co\n ve^\ tu+ ca'ch.

>   Kie^?u chuye^.n no. sang chuye^.n kia the^' na`y la` muo^'n "tha('ng 
> thua" ro^`i. Time out! I shut my mouth and quit.

I'll also stop this thread. Let the commission conclude first, I'll comment
later.

Cheers, Z