Dualism & Micro-Macro

[Sonnet Nguyen <Sonnet.Nguyen@fuw.edu.pl>]

Hi all,   (to Mr Aiviet et al)
If sbd systematically read what Aiviet said, then he (she) could learn how
to express ideas and actual scientific problems in the common (simple and
clear) language.  I would like to add few comments to what he had writen.  
In my opinion, in the natural sciences (i.e. excluding math) there is only
one most fundamental kind of dualism: "matter" and "energy".
Other dualisms are consequences of the above duality.   
In the classical mathematical language, matter is like "element" and
energy is like "relation".  Of course, one could denote that each element
can (always) be regarded as an "relation", but "relation" can not be
regarded as an element!  But for fixed set (for example: our universe, so
this observation is correct in every natural sciences) each relation
between elements of this set can be regarded as an element (of infinite
Decard product).  This trend also appears in "modern logics":
logics 0-th rank (i.e. classical logics), logics 1-st rank (as almost non
standar logics used in AI), logics 2-nd rank (i.e. terrible logics), ...,
logics n-th rank (i.e. unknown also for logicians) and infinity rank
(???).   
Few months ago, I have presented (in VNSA) few examples of duality in
physics and math. Now let talk about duality in social sciences and
cultures.  There are "pseudo-open" questions to everybody:
 1)Is Money an "element" or "relation"?  What is dual to "MONEY"?
 2)What is an dual model to the system "human+conceptions"?

Methodologies of sciences: "individual method" and "collective method"
are based on two possible answers (YES or NO) of the phylosophical
question about world outside:
                 Is nature reducible or not?
 
enjoys,
SN