Re: Ho?i ve^` Kie^`u

["Hung La" <hung_la@ibm.net>]

On  9 Jul 97 at 19:23, Tuan Pham wrote:

> Cha`o ca'c ba'c
> 
> Trong truye^.n Kie^`u co' ca^u
> 
> Co' nha` vie^n ngoa.i ho. Vu+o+ng
> Gia tu+ nghi?/~ cu~ng thu+o+`ng thu+o+`ng ba^.c trung
> 
> To^i thu+o+`ng nghe chu+~ "nghi?" ddu+o+.c ca('t nghia~ la`
> "ha('n, o^?ng" (tie^'ng ddi.a phu+o+ng) nhu+ng cu~ng
> co' ng` cho la` chu+~ "nghi~", vi` ne^'u vie^'t
> 
> Gia tu+ ha('n cu~ng thu+o+`ng thu+o+`ng ba^.c trung
> 
> thi` vu+a` vu.ng (sai va(n pha.m la` dda(`ng kha'c) vu+`a 
> ke'm tao nha~. Kho^ng bie^'t ba^y gio+` "official 
> interpretation" la` gi`? va` ca'c ba'c Nghe^. Ti~nh co' y' 
> kie^'n gi` kho^ng?


Hi anh Tua^'n!

Tha^`y Vie^.t va(n trung ho.c cu?a to^i cu~ng gia?ng nghi~a chu+~ 
_nghi?_ la` "ha('n" la` "o^ng a^'y" hay "o^?ng".

Ne^'u hie^?u ca^u ND vie^'t la`
_Nha` o^ng a^'y cu~ng thu+o+`ng thu+o+`ng ba^.c trung_ ha(? cu~ 
kho^ng dde^'n no^~i na`o.

Cheers
Hu`ng
(Kho^ng pha?i ngu+o+`i Nghe^. Ti~nh:))