Cha('n-more.

[Trinh Anh Tuan <s7593tri@sun10.vsz.bme.hu>]

  Hi anh Thanh and all,

> Theo to^i thi` cu' U` nay` la`possible,nay` nhe'
> Tre^n ba`i co' Thie^n khai cua? mo^t. trong nhung~ con sau: 3 van. hoac. 3
> van. hoac. 7 van>>>  nhu va^y. la`dda~ co' 4 cha<n' ro^i`, co^ng. the^m
> ddo^i Chi xe'ra a<n bon` cho` U` bach. thu? ddo'.(tre^n bai`kho^ng con`
> mo^t. qua^n ddo? nao`ngoai`nhu~ng con Chi dde^? ddu'o'c. kinh'tu' Chi)

 That "u`" is possible,though not the one you explained here (please
check your previous message if i'm wrong).You said you "chi'u u` ba.ch
thu? u` chi...",not "bo`n chi" here.Still,this "u`" might not be the 
greatest one due to how many "di.ch" you give each kind of "u`".

 By the way,some words about another philosophy of "cha('n".As you
mentioned. "thie^n u`","ddi.a u`" are all possible.But have you ever 
heard about "thie^n tho+`i,ddi.a lo+.i,nha^n ho`a" ?
 I saw a "chie^'u cha('n" where "nha^n u`" is also allowed.It is when you
u` by the card(la' ba`i) next to the "ddo^'c no.c" card.
 So,as you can see,all three kind of "u`" match very well with "thie^n
tho+`i,ddi.a lo+.i,nha^n ho`a" .I love "cha('n" this way !

Cheers,

--Tua^'n.