Re: Li.ch su+? Tu+? vi VN (2)

["Cu Huy Minh Tuan, Melbourne Australia" <GUEST2@holonic.gse.rmit.EDU.AU>]

  Hi ca'c ba'c 
  To^i xin ma.o muo^.i chen va`o va`i ca^u.
  
  Bac The Hung Nguyen wrote:  
> 
> Do tui chi? tri'ch (vi` no' da`i qua') chu+' o^ng Ha`i na`y co' 
> Nha^.t cu+ Ma~o, Nguye^.t cu+ Ho+.i , Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u
> gio^'ng nhu+ so^' cua? Kho^?ng MInh va^.y.
  
  To^i co' xem so^' Kho^?ng Minh o*? -da^u -do' ro^`i thi` pha?i. La' 
so^' to^i -du*o*.c xem co' Me^.nh ta.i Mu`i. Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u thi` 
la`m sao co' Nguye^.t ta.i Ho*.i chie^'u va`o -du*o*.c



> 
> 
> >2/ Ca^u " dda.i ha.n o+? cung ty', Ma~ ga(.p Dda` la...." nghi~a la` 
> gi` ???. Cu+' theo ca^u na`y ma` xe't thi` co' the^? hie^?u la` : Ma~ 
> cu~ng o+? trong cung ty'. 
> 
> Ca^u na`y xin ddu+o+.c kha^'t dde^? tui  ve^` xem la.i dda~

  Ma~ kho^ng bao gio*` o*? cung Ty' nhu*ng sao lu*u Ma~ co' the^? o*? 
cung Ty'

> 
> Cheers.
>