All Creatures Big and Small
(2015)
|
|
Watch Trailer 0Share... |
All Creatures Big and Small
(2015)
|
|
Watch Trailer 0Share... |
Credited cast: | |||
Dermot Magennis | ... |
Dave /
Mr. Griffin /
Prairie Dog
(voice)
|
|
Callum Maloney | ... |
Finny
(voice)
|
|
Tara Flynn | ... |
Hazel
(voice)
|
|
Ava Connolly | ... |
Leah
(voice)
|
|
Paul Tylak | ... |
Obesey /
Stayput /
Chimpanzee
(voice)
|
|
Alan Stanford | ... |
Lion
(voice)
|
|
Aileen Mythen | ... |
Mrs. Griffin /
Flamingo /
Mrs. Guard /
Margaret
(voice)
|
|
Patrick FitzSymons | ... |
Tanglefoot /
Mr. Guard /
Siberian Tiger
(voice)
|
|
Carla Becker | ... |
Rhinoceros
(voice)
|
|
Franciska Friede | ... |
Baby Hippopotamus #1 /
Songbird #1
(voice)
|
|
Lotta Doll | ... |
Baby Hippopotamus #2
(voice)
|
|
Tina Eschmann | ... |
Songbird #2
(voice)
|
|
Rest of cast listed alphabetically: | |||
Patrick Bach | ... |
Stayput (Germany)
|
|
Chris Evans | ... |
Stayput
(voice)
|
|
Wolf Frass | ... |
Herr Gorilla (Germany)
|
It's the end of the world. A flood is coming. Luckily for Dave and his son Finny, a couple of clumsy Nestrians, an Ark has been built to save all animals. But as it turns out, Nestrians aren't allowed. Sneaking on board with the involuntary help of Hazel and her daughter Leah, two Grymps, they think they're safe. Until the curious kids fall off the Ark. Now Finny and Leah struggle to survive the flood and hungry predators and attempt to reach the top of a mountain, while Dave and Hazel must put aside their differences, turn the Ark around and save their kids. It's definitely not going to be smooth sailing. Written by Anonymous
Commencing the movie defense in 3... 2... 1!
I, like probably many others, thought this was a generic animated motion picture "for the entire family". I was so wrong. So very wrong. Not only was it not generic; it was way better than expected. After all, it was so good, I am giving it a 9!
Okay, let's start with the premise. It is very simple. A single mother and a single father are separated from their daughter and son (respectively), and need to get back together. The daughter is a hunter-type animal who works alone, and the son is a timid-type animal with a natural gift for building things, and a love for warm hugs. It is one of THOSE movies, with the moral being "we need to work together!" It is, as I said, simple, and not terribly original.
Now, the reason I give this movie a 9 out of 10. Despite the simple old-as-dirt moral, the way it is HANDLED is great. Morals take a backseat, while the front seat gets firmly occupied by the action, the gags, and the dialogue. It is like the movie team were given complete creative freedom to come up with as many interesting scenes as possible, and they done all of them. The timing of the action is great, the lines are great, the voice acting is great, and not a single "funny" moment felt forced (to me anyway, some people are much more picky). Actually, this movie reminds me a lot of Penguins of Madagascar, in the way it's structured (simple moral, but runs on non-stop gags).
The animation has to be mentioned somewhere, so might as well mention it here. It is really good. The only parts where I thought things looked "imperfect", was every time tree branches were used. This animated movie does not have the best looking branches out there. Wood aside, all the textures and atmospheric effects are perfectly fine. And in my books "perfectly fine" equates to "nothing being wrong". The animation itself deserves a 9 as well.
You are probably asking at this point: "But what about the Ark? What about Noah? How are those elements used?" Well, I did not mark this review as containing spoilers, and I am not delivering any. Let's just say, the way the "Ark" part of the story is handled, is the most creative way I ever it seen it handled in any movie. And I'll leave it at that.
I won't spoil the ending either, but I will tell you that I did not see it coming. That was some truly great cartoon writing, and I was pleasantly surprised. Now, to reassure you somewhat, I wasn't born yesterday, and seen and read hundreds of stories. I have frames of reference, and I have developed that thing called "taste". The ending of this movie was GOOD. Trust me on that.
Last, but not least, the movie's title. It was changed for every country it was released in, if I am not mistaken. And it is funny, albeit in a sad way. It can instill the wrong impression upon the potential audience (aka, you), that the people who made this movie did not have any idea what they did. I assure you, the naming problem in no way reflects the actual content, because the movie is great. After all, if it wasn't, I wouldn't give it a 9 out of 10.
Watch it. Now. Don't be afraid. It's really good.