Twelve O'Clock High (1949) 7.8
A hard-as-nails general takes over a bomber unit suffering from low morale and whips them into fighting shape. Director:Henry King |
|
Watch Trailer 0Share... |
Twelve O'Clock High (1949) 7.8
A hard-as-nails general takes over a bomber unit suffering from low morale and whips them into fighting shape. Director:Henry King |
|
Watch Trailer 0Share... |
Complete credited cast: | |||
Gregory Peck | ... | ||
Hugh Marlowe | ... | ||
Gary Merrill | ... | ||
Millard Mitchell | ... | ||
Dean Jagger | ... | ||
Robert Arthur | ... | ||
Paul Stewart | ... | ||
John Kellogg | ... | ||
Robert Patten | ... |
Lt. Bishop
(as Bob Patten)
|
|
Lee MacGregor | ... | ||
Sam Edwards | ... | ||
Roger Anderson | ... |
In this story of the early days of daylight bombing raids over Nazi Germany, General Frank Savage must take command of a "hard luck" bomber group. Much of the story deals with his struggle to whip his group into a disciplined fighting unit in spite of heavy losses, and withering attacks by German fighters over their targets. Actual combat footage is used in this tense war drama. Written by KC Hunt <khunt@eng.morgan.edu>
Those who think that "Saving Private Ryan" was a great movie ought to watch this old black and white classic. In virtually every aspect except photography "Twelve O'Clock High" is superior. The script by Sy Bartlett in particular is vastly superior.
Spielberg's film focused on some of the command problems faced by Capt. John Miller (Tom Hanks) in fulfilling his combat mission, but the treatment and development were almost high schoolish (if I may) compared to the enthralling delineation in "Twelve O'Clock High." The problems encountered by Gregory Peck as the bomber group commander were complex, subtle and psychologically demanding, while the resolution was filled with the kind of male social and political dynamics not much explored at the movies these days.
Director Henry King's clean, crisp, "invisible" direction was also superior to the uneven and far too showy pandering from Spielberg. Furthermore the acting, with Gary Merrill and Hugh Marlowe supporting Peck, was also better.
Ted Danson in his cameo and Matt Damon at times in "Saving Private Ryan" were almost laughable.
Comparing the two movies makes one wonder how much movies really have improved. Technically they have in every respect, but too often today's film-makers think they can get by with special effects and splashy sets. Pour a lot of blood, show a lot of skin, get people at each other's throat, and it will play, seems to be the attitude. What is often forgotten are the two most important aspects of film, namely, story and character development.
In this respect I don't think today's films have improved on the great classics of the past.
(Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon!)