Re: Chi'nh ta?

[Dam Son <son@fermi.phys.washington.edu>]

On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Dam Son wrote:

> - hwa`n twa`n bo^? cu+~ "q": kwoc za (quo^'c gia), kwa^t (qua^'t),
                               ^^^^
Xin lo~i kak bak, toi da'nh nha^`m, "kwok" mo+'i du'ng.

Sau khi da'nh xong ba`i chu+o+k, toi ko^`n ngi~ ra la` ko^' the? zu`ng 
cu+~ "y" tha(i co^ cu+~ "u+" hie.n na(i (va` "cu+o+`i" -> kyo`i).  Nhy 
va^.i ko^`n tiet kie.m dyo.k nhie`w ho+n ny~o.  Da(`ng na`w thi` cy~ "y" 
ku~ ku~ng bi. tha(i het tha`nh "i" ro`i.

De` a'n kuo? toi cu~ng dyo.k da^'y chy', fa?i khong kak bak?

So+n

        Cha(m na(m cho^ng ko^~i ngyo`i ta,
        Cy~ ta`i cu+~ me^.nh khe^'w la` ge^t nhaw
        Cha?i kwa mo.t kwo.k be? za^w
        Nhy~ng die`u chong tha^'i ma` daw do+'n lo^`ng
        La. zi` bi? sa(k ty fo^ng
        Cho+`i xanh kwe^n tho^'i ma' ho`ng da'nh ge^n
        Ka?w tho+m la^`n zo+? chyok de^`n...