Re: Tri ha`nh ho+.p nha^'t

[Hong Lam Vu <vuh000@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de>]

Hi ba'c Vie^.t,
> 
>   Ca'c cha^n ly' dde^`u kho^ng ti'nh dde^'n hi`nh tha'i vi` va^.y kho^ng 
> co' chu+~ chu+a. Chu+a cu~ng nhu+ kho^ng. Nghi~a la` anh chu+a la`m thi` 
> chu+a the^? tuye^n bo^' la` "bie^'t ma^`n" ddu+o+.c. 
> 

Cha` cha`, ba'c Vie^.t no'i chuye^.n Cha^n ly' nhe'. Dda^'y, the^' ma`
cu+' a'm chi? tui la` Ontologist. Tui chi? "ontologist" o+? dda^u ddo'
tho^i chu+' khi la`m khoa ho.c tui la` positivist dda^'y ba'c a.

Chu+a ma` nhu+ kho^ng thi` dda(.t ra chu+~ chu+a la`m gi`? (an
"ontologist" argument). Tui hie^?u "chu+a" la` "kho^ng" ma` CU~NG la` "se~
co'". Ca^u dda^`u ba'c du`ng an ontologist argument, ca^u cuo^'i ba'c la.i
du`ng a positivist argument. Tui cu~ng khoa'i eclecticism la('m, nhu+ng
ma` kho^ng dduo+.c vu+`a dda' bo'ng vu+`a du`ng tay ma` ba?o la` ddang
cho+i bo'ng chuye^`n nhu+ the^' na`y dduo+.c.

A` ma` hi`nh nhu+ tui hie^?u nha^`m ba'c thi` pha?i, tui co' ca?m gia'c
nhu+ the^'. Ba'c thu+? no'i ro~ la.i xem.

>    La`m ma` kho^ng bie^'t la`m: O^ la` la`, ca'i na`y nhie^`u la('m, 
> dda^m tha`nh ra cu+' nghi~ ba^.y.
> 
>    Vi` va^.y hie^'m ngu+o+`i tri hanh ho+.p nha^'t la('m.

Thu+.c ti`nh tui va^~n chu+a hie^?u ca'i tri ha`nh ho+.p nha^'t cu?a ba'c
la` gi`. Mong ba'c gia?i thi'ch ro~ the^m.

Cheers,
La^m.