Re: ti`nh ye^u va` ho^n nha^n tho+`i kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng

[Minh Dang <dang@par.univie.ac.at>]

Hi Kie^`u!

> ma^'y ho^m nay tha^'y ca'c ba'c ba`n ta'c ve^` chuye^.n to^n gia'o ,chu+~
> nho ... em u he^'t ca? da^`u vi`cha(?ng hie^?u gi` ca? . em chi? co' ta^m
> ho^`n a(n uo^'ng la`phong phu' tho^i ca'c ba'c a. !
> nha^n em do.c mo^.t ba`i ba'o cu~ng hay hay , muo^'n tham kha?o y' kie^'n
> cu?a ca'c ba'c ve^` " Va^'n de^`muo^n thuo+? " 

Ho^m nay tu+. nhie^n tha^'y Kie^`u no'i chuye^.n "ngu+o+`i lo+'n" va`
cu~ng "trie^'t ly'", gia^.t mi`nh pha?i ddo.c ky~ ba`i na`y ;-).

> ... Co' la^`n ngu+o+`i vie^'t ba`i na`y du+o+.c nghe ke^? la.i chuye^.n
> mo^.t cu. gia`. Cu. gia` a^'y the^`tha`o : " Ho^`i co`n tre? to^i cu+'
> ngo+~ la`co' tie^`n thi` se~ mua du+o+.c ti`nh ye^u . Ma~i de^'n ba^y
> gio+` to^i mo+'i hie^?u die^`u do' la`... du'ng ! " . Do' la`mo^.t ca^u

Cu. na`y ho.c ho+i cha^.m, ca^`n ca? 1 ddo+`i cho mo^.t chuye^.n the^' na`y.

> No' nhu+ mo^.t tuye^n ngo^n cho mo^.t thu+' ti`nh ye^u co' the^? mua
> ba'n,mo^.t ti`nh ye^u chi.u su+. a'p lu+.c cu?a tho+`i buo^?i kinh te^'
> thi. tru+o+`ng .Pha?i cha(ng ti`nh ye^u cha^n chi'nh da~ bi. xo'a so^?
> bo+?i co+ che^' thi. tru+o+`ng ? ....

Ddoa.n na`y cha('c Kie^`u ddo.c (hay che'p) tu+` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng to+` 
ba'o la' ca?i na`o ddo' hie^.n gio+` ddang tra`n nga^.p Vie^.t Nam? Gio.ng 
va(n na`y la`m to^i nho+' la.i nhu+~ng ca^u ke^'t lua^.n ho.c sinh VN va^~n
thu+o+`ng vie^'t ho^`i to^i co`n be': "du+o+'i ma'i tru+o+`ng xa~ ho^.i chu?
nghia~, chu'ng em nghi~ ...", ddo.c nghe ra^'t tho^'i (Sorry, Kieu! for this 
rough criticism, but I damned hate this style). Chuye^.n tie^`n co' 
pha?i lu'c na`o cu~ng mua ddu+o+.c ti`nh kho^ng thi` dde^? ca'c ba'c 
ca~i nhau. Nhu+ng dde^'n ddu+'a tre? con cu~ng bie^'t la` nhu~ng mo^'i
ti`nh ddu+o+.c (hay bi.) mua ba(`ng tie^`n co' o+? mo.i tho+`i dda.i, mo.i
xa~ ho^.i, chuye^.n na`y cu~ng cu~ nhu+ ti`nh ye^u va` ta^'t nhie^n cha(?ng
lie^n quan gi` dde^'n "kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng" ca?.

Maybe I'm overreacting now, but I'm a bit allergic to such sentences like:
"pha?i cha(ng ti`nh ye^u CHA^N CHI'NH dda~ bi. XO'A XO^? ...." 

Kie^`u! Sorry again! Besides, I'm sure the text in your mail was originally
NOT from you. Otherwise I hadn't had  the courage to object you ;-).

Cheers,

minh.

P.S: Nga`y mai co' nhi`n tha^'y Kie^`u o+? tru+o+`ng thi` cha('c pha?i la^?n ddi
cho^~ kha'c ;-).