[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ba'c Minh chu' y' :))
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Minh Dang wrote:
> Hi Kie^`u!
>
> > ma^'y ho^m nay tha^'y ca'c ba'c ba`n ta'c ve^` chuye^.n to^n gia'o ,chu+~
> > nho ... em u he^'t ca? da^`u vi`cha(?ng hie^?u gi` ca? . em chi? co' ta^m
> > ho^`n a(n uo^'ng la`phong phu' tho^i ca'c ba'c a. !
> > nha^n em do.c mo^.t ba`i ba'o cu~ng hay hay trong ba'o phu nu+~ cua?
chi. Die^~m chi , muo^'n tham kha?o y' kie^'n cu?a ca'c ba'c ve^` " Va^'n
de^`muo^n thuo+? "
>
> Ho^m nay tu+. nhie^n tha^'y Kie^`u no'i chuye^.n "ngu+o+`i lo+'n" va`
> cu~ng "trie^'t ly'", gia^.t mi`nh pha?i ddo.c ky~ ba`i na`y ;-).
hihi , ba'c bao gio+` cu~ng che^ ngu+o+`i ta tre? con ,ba'c ngu+o+`i lo+'n
vo+'i ai ha? ? chi? du+o+.c ca'i ba('t na.t ngu+o+`i ta la` gio?i !!!!
>
> > ... Co' la^`n ngu+o+`i vie^'t ba`i na`y du+o+.c nghe ke^? la.i chuye^.n
> > mo^.t cu. gia`. Cu. gia` a^'y the^`tha`o : " Ho^`i co`n tre? to^i cu+'
> > ngo+~ la`co' tie^`n thi` se~ mua du+o+.c ti`nh ye^u . Ma~i de^'n ba^y
> > gio+` to^i mo+'i hie^?u die^`u do' la`.... du'ng ! " . Do' la`mo^.t ca^u
>
> Cu. na`y ho.c ho+i cha^.m, ca^`n ca? 1 ddo+`i cho mo^.t chuye^.n the^' na`y.
>
> > No' nhu+ mo^.t tuye^n ngo^n cho mo^.t thu+' ti`nh ye^u co' the^? mua
> > ba'n,mo^.t ti`nh ye^u chi.u su+. a'p lu+.c cu?a tho+`i buo^?i kinh te^'
> > thi. tru+o+`ng .Pha?i cha(ng ti`nh ye^u cha^n chi'nh da~ bi. xo'a so^?
> > bo+?i co+ che^' thi. tru+o+`ng ? ....
>
> Ddoa.n na`y cha('c Kie^`u ddo.c (hay che'p) tu+` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng to+`
> ba'o la' ca?i na`o ddo' hie^.n gio+` ddang tra`n nga^.p Vie^.t Nam? Gio.ng
> va(n na`y la`m to^i nho+' la.i nhu+~ng ca^u ke^'t lua^.n ho.c sinh VN va^~n
> thu+o+`ng vie^'t ho^`i to^i co`n be': "du+o+'i ma'i tru+o+`ng xa~ ho^.i chu?
> nghia~, chu'ng em nghi~ ...", ddo.c nghe ra^'t tho^'i (Sorry, Kieu! for this
> rough criticism, but I damned hate this style). Chuye^.n tie^`n co'
> pha?i lu'c na`o cu~ng mua ddu+o+.c ti`nh kho^ng thi` dde^? ca'c ba'c
> ca~i nhau. Nhu+ng dde^'n ddu+'a tre? con cu~ng bie^'t la` nhu~ng mo^'i
> ti`nh ddu+o+.c (hay bi.) mua ba(`ng tie^`n co' o+? mo.i tho+`i dda.i, mo.i
> xa~ ho^.i, chuye^.n na`y cu~ng cu~ nhu+ ti`nh ye^u va` ta^'t nhie^n cha(?ng
> lie^n quan gi` dde^'n "kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng" ca?.
>
> Maybe I'm overreacting now, but I'm a bit allergic to such sentences like:
> "pha?i cha(ng ti`nh ye^u CHA^N CHI'NH dda~ bi. XO'A XO^? ...."
- la.i nu*~a , ba'c da.o na`y ho+i bi. di. u+'ng qua' da^'y ( kho^ng
bie^'t co' pha?i ta.i di. u+'ng pha^'n hoa ma` bie^'n chu+'ng cha(ng :))))
- thu+' hai nu+~a la` ro~ ra`ng ngay tu+` da^`u tie^n em da~ vie^'t la`
do.c tu+` mo^.t ba`i ba'o ra ,9 ngu+o+`i 10 y',ba'c cu~ng kho^ng the^?
nha^.n di.nh du+o+.c mo^.t ca'ch chu? quan ra(`ng tho^'i hay kho^ng ?
em tha^'y chi. Die^~m chi( ngu+o+`i vie^'t ba`i ba'o na`y ) chi? du'a ra
mo^.t de^` ta`i hoa`n toa`n la` co' thu+.c , Di~ nhie^n la` kho^ng ai
co^ng nha^.n la` tho+`i buo^?i na`y TA^'T CA? ti`nh ye^u va` ho^n nha^n
de^`u bi. kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng a?nh hu+o+?ng . Nhu+ng thu+.c tra.ng
cu~ng cho tha^'y ra(`ng do " tho+`i buo^?i kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng " ma`
nhu+~ng chuye^.n ma^'y co^ vie^.t nam do^`ng loa.t la^'y cho^`ng made in
Da`i Loan ,hoa*.c la^'y cho^`ng Vie^.t kie^`u ? ....
ui do'i bu.ng qua' ro^`i , bu'~a kha'c no'i chuye^.n " ngu+o+`i lo+'n"
vo+'i ba'c nhe' !
>
> Kie^`u! Sorry again! Besides, I'm sure the text in your mail was originally
> NOT from you. Otherwise I hadn't had the courage to object you ;-).
>
> Cheers,
>
> minh.
>
> P.S: Nga`y mai co' nhi`n tha^'y Kie^`u o+? tru+o+`ng thi` cha('c pha?i la^?n ddi
> cho^~ kha'c ;-).
>