RE: Phe^ bi`nh ba`i phe^ bi`nh cu?a Tra^`n Ma.nh Ha?o

["Hoang Duong Tuan" <tuan@toyota-ti.ac.jp>]

Hi ba'c Ha?i co^' va^'n:

>I actually agree with much of what anh AiViet and anh Ho Tu
>Bao said. 
>Tra^`n Ma.nh Ha?o didn't really write a professional
>literature review a` la anh Tuan Pham's style 

What's yours point? The main message of
ba'c Ba?o is 

>To^i kho^ng hay co' di.p ddo.c TMH, nhu+ng tha^'y ba'c na`y luo^n
>tha(?ng tha('n tri`nh ba`y quan ddie^?m cu?a mi`nh, va` ddie^`u na`y
>kho^ng luo^n de^~ da`ng. 

Va^.y ba'c Ha?i ddo^`ng y' vo+'i ba'c Ba?o cho^~ na`o dda^'y hu+?.

>Rather, his main point is
>merely the wonder if CHCC is not one such glorifying and
>justifying product. If so, he is concerned that the
>attention that it gets and the influence that it yields can
>contribute to further glorying and justifying moral
>corruption, which is already pervalent in today society. He
>did make his point, and he is not alone with that.


DDoa.n na`y thi` theo tui hoa(.c la` la.c dde^`, hoa(.c la` ho^ kha^?u
hie^.u. Ngoa.i tru+` phe^ bi`nh cu?a ba'c TP, ca'c phe^ bi`nh kha'c
ba`n xem lie^.u o+? tho+`i buo^?i na`y co' ne^n cha^'p nha^.n 
"lo^'i phe^ bi`nh kie^?u quy chu.p, phu. ho.a chi'nh quye^`n cu?a 
TMH" kho^ng? O+? dda^y co`n va^'n dde^` very delicate va` nghie^m
tro.ng nu+~a la` ba`i na`y dda(ng o+? ba'o Nha^n Da^n. Theo ngo^n
ngu+~ cu?a chi. em thi` "ddie^`u na`y dda~ no'i le^n ta^'t ca?" ru`i.

TD