[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wrong practice



Hi Iga & So+n,
                  
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Dam Thanh Son wrote: 
>
> > 3.  O+? nhu+~ng kha'ch sa.n lo+'n o+? phi'a Nam, kho^ng co' ca'ch na`o
> > mo^.t ddo^i nam nu+~ thue^ ddu+o+.c mo^.t pho`ng chung ne^'u kho^ng co'
> > gia^'y dda(ng ky' ke^'t ho^n!

  Tu+` ddo' suy ra co' 2 kha? na(ng chi'nh: ca'c vi. nghi~ ra chi'nh 
sa'ch no'i tre^n hoa(.c la` "co' bo^. na~o cha^.m pha't trie^?n"  hoa(.c 
la` .... "ddo^`ng ti'nh luye^'n a'i" /i't ra la` co' ca?m ti`nh :-)/.  
  Ca'c ca(.p nam-nam, nu+~-nu+~ dda^u co' bi. ai hoa.nh  ho.e ho?i 
gia^'y ma' ke^'t ho^n gi` dda^u.  Thi` ra eg. strong lobby of
homosexualists in San Francisco dda~ a(n nha(`m gi` dda^u so vo+'i VN, 
o+? VN  ro~ nhu+ ban nga`y la` heterosexualists are deeply
discriminated :-)) 

  Chi'nh sa'ch "Nam Nu+~ Thu. Thu. Ba^'t Tha^n" kie^?u na`y ca^`n
so+'m de.p ddi.  Hay la` VNse pseudo-moralists ddang muo^'n ddu+a 
ca? da^n to^.c quay ve^` tho+`i trung co^? ? :-))

SN