Re: Ha`n Phi & Pha'p tri.

[Hong Lam Vu <vuh000@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de>]

On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Tran Minh Tien wrote:

> 
> > Ba`i na`y to^i chu+a dduo+.c ddo.c, ba'c tuo+ng la.i le^n dda6y cho anh
> > chi. em nhu+ to^i cu`ng xem dduo+.c kho`^ng?
> > 
> Ba'c Ho^`ng La^m o+i, kho^ng ddu+o+.c dda^u vi` la` ba`i tranh lua^.n
> vo+'i nhie^`u ngu+o+`i kha'c nhau\.

Hi Tie^'n, thi` ca^.u gu+?i privat cho to+' va^.y.

> 
> > Y' ba'c hay dda^'y. Mi`nh se~ pha?i ba`n la.i sau vu. no'i chuye^.n ve^`
> > Cao xua^n huy vo+'i ba'c Vie^.t. To^i cu~ng co' ca?m tuo+?ng bo.n Locke,
> > Rousseau va` ngay ca? Kant cu~ng chu+a ba(`ng CXH nha` mi`nh. Nhu+ng ma`
> > vie^.c na`y pha?i nho+` ba'c check out xem cu. CXH la` nha` pha't trie^?n
> > La~o tu+? hay cu. chi? "di.ch" La~o tu+? ra ngo^n ngu+~ nga`y nay tho^i.
> > 
> 
> Ba'c gu+?i cho to^i co' 2 thie^n, la`m sao to^i lua^.n ra ddu+o+.c ?
> Do ddo' to^i toa`n du`ng "tu+ tu+o+?ng phu+o+ng DDo^ng" la` cha('c a(n,
> kho?i so+. sai\. Nhu+ng ma` ve^` kho^ng-tho+`i gian to^i chi? tha^'y
> co' ha`ng Bie^.t Ma(.c, Co^ng To^n Long, Hue^. Thi ... la` co' ba`n ba.c tho^i\.
> Ma` ca'i ho. ba`n lo+`i le~ mo^ng lung kho' hie^?u la('m,
> cha? the^' ma` Nho gia ma('ng ho. la` bo.n ngu.y bie^.n, kho^ng cho cho+i

 
 dde^` xu+o+'ng phu.c ho^`i ca'i ho.c Chu+ tu+?\.<--- Chu* hay Chu dda^y? 

Va^.y la` pha?i co'p the^m ma^'y thie^n nu+~a gu+?i cho ca^.u ro^`i.
Hie^.n sa'ch dda~ cho muo+.n, dde^? ho^m na`o ddo`i ve^` se~ co'p. Na`y
nhu+ng ma` ca^.u pha?i gia?ng cho 1 ba`i ve^` kho^ng-tho+`i gian ma` bo.n
Ta`u co^? dda.i dda~ ba`n.



> 
> Tra^`n Minh Tie^'n
> 
>