Re: Tha('c ma('c: Fuzzy logic

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>]

Hi Anh Thanh Tung Truong,
  Thank you for the very careful article. I was most satisfied with your
answer than too abstract answers, as I think the implementation principles
are more important than the concept in this case. ( the concept has been 
known for a long time).
  My concern was that whether we have a new "fuzzy" device to realize
the fuzzy logic instead of the known devices. I have designed few fuzzy
devices that accept as logic values TRUE,FALSE, I DON'T KNOW 1, I DON'T 
KNOW 2... But that was really a composition of the original logical gates.
So, my point was that we can stay with the binary logic as well.
The new "invention" is just an implementation achivement not a new 
technology.
  Am I correct?
Cheers
Aiviet