Re: [Tin VNSA] Gia tru*o*?ng a<n so` huye^'t xong he^'t muo^'n ddo.c sa'ch!

[Hong Lam Vu <vuh000@goofy.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de>]

On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Ian Bui wrote:

> Chu*~ "gia tru*o*?ng" bac' du`ng ca'ch ddo' thu' tha^.t to*'
> mo*i' nghe dda^y la^`n dda^`u. Tru*o*'c khi ti`m ra ddu'ng chu*~
> dde^? di.ch sang tie^'ng Anh co' le~ ba'c ca^`n cho bie^'t the^m
> y' nghia~, go^'c ga'c cu?a tu*` nay`. Paternalism co' the^? hie^?u
> theo nhie^`u kie^?u, bie^'t dda^u du`ng dde^? di.ch khai' nie^.m
> "gia tru*o*?ng" cu~ng o^?n. Nhu*ng ne^'u no'i ve^` ca'ch su*? du.ng
> tho^ng thu*o*`ng thi` chu*~ Paternalistic thu*o*`ng a'm chi? mo^.t
> ca'i gi` kho^ng ddu*o*.c hay cho la<'m (i.e. having negative 
> connotations) trong khi chu*~ "gia tru*o*?ng" to*' nghe co' ve? 
> nhe. nha`ng va` neutral ho*n nhie^u` (hay la` dda^y la` ca'ch
> du`ng mo*'i sau nay` tho^i ?)

Hi ba'c Ian,

Chu+~ "gia truo+?ng" trong tie^'ng Vie^.t also has negative connotations.
Gia truo+?ng_ no^m na la` _o^ng chu? trong nha`_, o^ng chi? tay 5 ngo'n,
sai nguo+`i no. ba?o nguo+`i kia.

Chu+~ "quan tha^`y" theo tui has nothing to do with paternalistic. Tui
ddang pha^n va^n chu+~ paternaism ne^n hie^?u la` "gia truo+?ng" hay "phu.
quye^`n".

Cheers,
Hong Lam