Re: VN & Chine

[Tuan Dang <tqd1@cornell.edu>]

At 12:09 PM 3/14/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi ba'c Aiviet and all,
>
>>   A my chinese friend from Yunnan said that he would like to see China 
>> collapse after Teng died. He thinks that he is closer to VN than Beijing.
>
>Is he an ethnic Chinese (Ha'n) or "minority"?
Hi Bac La^m et al.,
Toi co noi chuyen voi vai nguoi TQ (ca mainland lan TW), ho co ve mo ho ve
nguon goc cua ho. Hoac la ho co^' ti`nh nhan la nguoi Ha'n ca?. Thuc ra thi
khong phai vay. Toi co doc duoc o dau ddo' ra(`ng Dang Tieu Binh va Ly Quang
Dieu dde^`u la` nguoi He. (Haake) ca? Co ba'c na`o co tai lieu confirm khong?
BTW, co ba'c na`o ddoc. Bi`nh Nguye^n Lo^.c "Nguo^`n Go^'c Ma~ Lai cua? Da^n
To^.c VN"? Theo toi thi quyen nay cung thu vi, ta`i lie^.u phong phu'. To^i
ti`m tha^'y o*? dda^y cau tra? lo*`i cho ma^'y chuye^.n ma` tru*o*'c nay
va^~n mo* ho^`. Cha(?ng ha.n: Chu? nha^n cu?a ne^`n va(n ho'a DDo^ng So*n
va` ca'c tro^'ng ddo^`ng Ngo.c Lu~ co pha?i la` to^? tie^n cua? chung ta
nga`y nay kho^ng? Theo BNL la` CO'. Hoa(.c nga`y xua ng^on ngu*~ cua? Hai
Ba` Tru*ng nhu* the^' na`o? vv Co' ba'c na`o pha?n ba'c la.i Bin`h Nguye^n
Lo^.c Kho^ng?
Ba'c La^m co nha('c de^'n Sinic family, xin noi ro~ ho*n mo^.t chu't kho^ng?
Thanks.  
Cheers,
Tuan.
 
>
>2 na(m truo+'c dda^y, 2 chines scholars o+? Vie^.n ha`n la^m khxh TQ co'
>vie^'t 1 "ba'o ca'o" cho Bo^. chi'nh tri. ve^` tuo+ng lai TQ. 2 vi. na`y
>dde^` nghi. China should adopt a federalistic system like the US's,
>otherwise the future of this last Empire willbe unpredictable, i.e. chaos.
>2 vi. na`y tu+`ng to^'t nghie^.p master ve^` political science at Yale or
>Harvard. Kinh te^' thi. truo+`ng va` tu+ tuo+?ng tie^m nhie^~m cu?a the
>West se~ bie^'n ddo^?i TQ trong tk 21.
>
>Let me be a Notradamus:
>
>After 1997 it is not China which takes over Hong Kong but Hong Kong wich
>takes over China. A process of federalization will be irresistible. Either
>Beijing must accept a formula of "one country, more systems" as step 1,
>and than "one country, more governements" as the next step, or China fall
>in chaos. This chaos comes step by step, yet is irresistible.
>
>Taiwan already have been developing her own (national) identity. She could
>come back to China (more exactly a Greater China: "TQ Mo+? Ro^.ng",
>ddu+`ng di.ch sai tha`nh "Dda.i Trung Hoa"!) only when her proposal of
>"one country, two governments" is accepted by Beijing.
>
>A new inter(intra)national order in Asia Pacific region seems to be
>emerging. Viets can return into the great Sinized (Sinic) family again.
>Hi` hi` ca'i na`y cha(?ng ai thi'ch ma` ai cu~ng thi'ch.
>
>Hong Lam
>
>
>
>