Re: Vietnam and China

["Toan" <toan@usa.net>]

Chu choa, 

La^u nay tui che^ ba'c A'iVie^.t A(ng-le^ dda^`y mi`nh ma`  nay thi`
A(ng-le^ tui cu~ng chi.u ddo.c luo^n. 
Ddo^`ng y' vo+'i ba'c nga`y hai la^`n kho^ng bie^'t co' ddu+o+.c cho to^
pho+? na`o ho^ng dda^y?

Tui tha^'y ta ne^n nhi`n ca'ch pha?n u+'ng cu?a ca'c the^' lu+.c (ba^'t
cu+' la` ai) theo qua' tri`nh die^~n tie^'n va` nhu+~ng gi` tu+`ng xa?y ra.


Vie^.c qua^n va` lu+.c (lu+.c no'i chung=vo~ va` cha'nh tri.) kho^ng
thu+o+`ng du+ng du+ng ma` bu`ng no^? vo^ ca(n cu+', vo^ ti'ch su+. dda(`ng
sau lu+ng. 

Bo^. ca'c ba'c nghi~ vu. vi.nh ba('c bo^. Maddox la` tai na.n hay sao?
Ta^'t nhie^n la` kho^ng. Bo^. ma^'y cha`ng Ta`u lo^i ma~ ta^'u vu+o+.t nu'i
qua Vie^.t Nam mua' Kung Fu cho+i cho vui ho^`i 78-79 sao? Bo^. Vie^.t Nam
buo^`n buo^`n dda'nh tra^.n Kampuchia 2 nga`y ro^`i ngo^`i i` ddo' cho+i 10
na(m mo+'i chi.u ve^` la` chuye^.n ngo^`i la^u quen cho^~ sao? 

Ta^'t ca? co' mo^.t bo^'i ca?nh dda(`ng sau. Kho^ng the^? bie^'t ro~
ddu+o+.c 100% vi` va^.n cuo^.c co`n co' la('m e'o le, nhu+ng nhi`n thi`
pha?i nhi`n qua' tri`nh nhu+ ba'c A'iVie^.t vu+`a tri`nh ba`y thi` i't ra
mo+'i cho ta tha^'y bo^'i ca?nh phi'a sau kia.

Tui kho^ng vo^.i tre^` mo^i che^ ma^'y chu' Chie^.t, nhu+ng ma` ma^'y chu'
la^u nay dda'nh dda^u thi` tu+. ba^`m mi`nh no+i ddo', cha? ra gi`. Dda'nh
dda^'m kho^ng pha?i nghe^` cu?a ma^'y chu' a^'y.  Nhu+ng ma^'y chu' a^'y
thi'ch ra ma(.t ma~i vo~ la('m. 

Tui kho^ng a(n pho+? ho^m nay vi` .... ddang a(n chay. (ca'c ba'c a., a(n
thi.t thi` a(n, nhu+ng ra'n ma` bo+'t la.i va` ddo^.n rau va`o cho nhie^`u)

Toa`n 

----------
> From: Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu>
> Subject: Re: Vietnam and China
> Date: Thursday, 20 March 1997 10:28 PM
> 
> Hi Ca'c Anh,
>    Suddenly it came to my mind that China had been involved in a lot of 
> quarrels with her 
> neighbors in this century, but never won totally. I hope that we will not

> be an exception.
> Look:
>    - War with USSR: China was totally defeated, so that after then the 
> russian can meats were called Chinese soldiers in East Europe.
>    - War with India: China victoried but only locally.
>    - Korean War: China baked more than haft million soldiers with a 
> limited success. She had to be satisfied with the existence of South
Korea.
>    - War with Japan: A clear defeat. Without the global victory of 
> aliens, especially the direct participation of Russian Red Army, China
> could have been a tragedy.
>   - Burma War: Not very impressive for China.
>   - War with Vietnam in 1979: Ridiculous soldier baking.
> If the induction is true then we can conclude about the China power. She 
> might be only a "paper tiger".
>   
>   Nga`y xu+a Trung Quo^'c the^` cho^'ng My~ cho dde^'n ngu+o+`i Vie^.t 
> nam cuo^'i cu`ng, ga^`n dda^y ho+n TQ the^` cho^'ng Vie^.t nam dde^'n 
> ngu+o+`i Ca(mpuchia cuo^'i cu`ng.
>   Vi` va^.y sau ma^'y nga`y, to^'i nay to^i la`m hai to^ pho+? xe lu+?a.
> 
> Cheers
> Aiviet
> 
>