Re: kha^?n! -Reply

[Duc Nguyen <dnguyen@uspto.gov>]

Tru+o+`ng ho+.p na`y to^i dda~ nghe qua.  Ddu'ng nhu+ anh no'i, be^.nh 
hoa.i huye^'t (go.i ung thu+ ma'u thi` k0 ddu+o+.c ro~ nghi~a cho la('m) 
na`y ca^`n pha?i ti`m ddu+o+.c ngu+o+`i co' tu?y xu+o+ng thi'ch ho+.p 
tru+o+'c dda~ , ro^`i mo+'i ti'nh chuye^.n sang tu?y .  Ngu+o+`i co' tu?y 
xu+o+ng thi'ch ho+.p thi` ha^`u nhu+ luo^n luo^n la` ngu+o+`i ba` con 
tha^n thuo^.c , lie^n he^. ca`ng ga^`n ca`ng co' nhie^`u hy vo.ng .  
Vie^.c tra('c ngie^.m va` ca^'y tu?y xu+o+ng ca'c be^.nh vie^.n lo+'n o+? 
My~ dde^`u co' the^? la`m ddu+o+.c .  Va^'n dde^` la` o+? phi' to^?n va` 
gia^'y to+` di chuye^?n .  

DN

On Thu, 8 May 1997, Frank Nguyen wrote:

> Hi anh Duc,
> 
> Theo to^i nghi~ be^.nh na`y la` be^.nh hoa.i huye^'t hoa(.c ung thu+ ma'u,
> lu+o+.ng ba.ch huye^'t ca^`u nhie^`u ho+n ho^`ng huye^'t ca^`u\.  Be^.nh
> na`y ga^y che^'t ngu+o+`i, chu+' be^.nh ba.ch ta.ng hie^'m khi la('m\.
> 
> Tha^n,
> FN
> 
> >>> Duc Nguyen <dnguyen@uspto.gov> - 5/8/97 7:49 AM >>>
> 
> Be^.nh "ma'u tra('ng" la` be^.nh gi` va^.y?  Tie^'ng Anh go.i la` gi`?
> Co' pha?i la` be^.nh "ba.ch ta.ng" kho^ng?
> Co' ai bie^'t kho^ng chi? giu`m.
> 
> 
> 
>